CSX reveal date?

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
atrainguy60
Saginaw Sub Foamer
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:54 pm
Location: None of your business......

CSX reveal date?

Unread post by atrainguy60 »

Is there a date set when CSX will publicly announce what lines will be sold off, or is it a total mystery at this point?

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15385
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by Saturnalia »

I wouldn't expect a huge one-day release, but rather the slow trickle of STB filings we've been seeing recently.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

atrainguy60
Saginaw Sub Foamer
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:54 pm
Location: None of your business......

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by atrainguy60 »

MQT3001 wrote:I wouldn't expect a huge one-day release, but rather the slow trickle of STB filings we've been seeing recently.
Ahh ok. I'm really curious to see what happens around here, if anything, but I guess I'm just gotta remain patient. Thanks!

MSchwiebert
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1611
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:43 pm
Location: Perrysburg Ohio

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by MSchwiebert »

I'd agree, from what I understand, after each segment is sold CSX will do a system re-evaluation to see what new impacts/opportunities will present themselves. In other words, it'll look something like this.

Line segment "A" is sold.
CSX does system evaluation/review determining that line segment "B" is a good sale/spin off candidate
Line segment "B" is sold.
CSX does system evaluation/review determining that line segment "C" is a good sale/spin off candidate
Line segment "C" is sold

and so on.

JStryker722
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 676
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:52 am
Location: Inkster,MI

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by JStryker722 »

Did I miss something here about CSX routes in Michigan?
My Wife says my first love is trains..anint that the truth! Lol :D

atrainguy60
Saginaw Sub Foamer
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:54 pm
Location: None of your business......

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by atrainguy60 »

JStryker722 wrote:Did I miss something here about CSX routes in Michigan?
CSX announced a few months ago that they were planning to sell off a bunch of lines from around their system. Among those under review to be possibly sold off is Michigan's trackage.

http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/20 ... ntial-sale

JStryker722
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 676
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:52 am
Location: Inkster,MI

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by JStryker722 »

Oh thats old news lol. CSX Michigan trackage has been under "study for possible sale or lease" since the end of CP running over the PM and the selling or leasing of most of the Thumb trackage to LSRC in 2005.I'll believe a change in ownership/operators when I see it.
My Wife says my first love is trains..anint that the truth! Lol :D

chapmaja
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:02 pm

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by chapmaja »

I think this time is a much more likely situation.

What I expect to happen is Plymouth north to Flint as well as the Port Huron trackage will be sold / leased to LSRC.

The trackage west of Plymouth to Holland will end up going by lease to either Marquette or LSRC. I don't think they will dump from Holland south because of the power plant and western coal. I also think there will be some sort of agreement where CSX retains the rights to the grain trains over the leased trackage.

I'm not sure which company would be better off with the tracks west of Plymouth. I can see advantages of MQT having that trackage given their reach on the west side of the state.

I could also see CSX holding onto the Plymouth - Holland segment as well.

Waddy
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:48 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by Waddy »

It wouldnt surprise me if the elk tried to get gr to plymouth

User avatar
Racer
Stops in Oncoming Traffic
Posts: 4365
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:40 pm
Location: Livonia, MI

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by Racer »

CSX could very well keep west of Plymouth if everything north of Plymouth goes to LSRC. With all LSRC’s traffic funneling directly into Plymouth might provide a more important route getting freight off their railroad to Chicago and points west versus now where the majority of it goes via Toledo because of the way their traffic is blocked to run on D735/736.
"...and I was in the front and Matt grabbed and pulled my ears from behind me and made horsey sounds."

Super Chief
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:53 am
Location: Three Rivers, Mi.--Indian Rocks Beach,Fl.

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by Super Chief »

Agreed it would help LSRC to go west and likewise MQT to go east. Don't really see any strategic benefit for Watco to be interested at all. When Shasta Duffy sales/ marketing rep left Elk to go to LSRC, Grand Elk really hasn't added any new traffic to what they already had. Look at how many new customers Lake State has gotten. Elks only mission is a reliable feeder to NS and what new customers come along pretty much rely on a lot of additional factors. She needed to keep her job interesting and Lake State responded. In fact MQT. better have a plan if CSX is no more, who they gonna interchange with? Haul the cars to Holland, Elk gets them or trackage rights? You know the STB will be involved if a sale is made.

Waddy
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:48 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by Waddy »

Super Chief wrote:Agreed it would help LSRC to go west and likewise MQT to go east. Don't really see any strategic benefit for Watco to be interested at all. When Shasta Duffy sales/ marketing rep left Elk to go to LSRC, Grand Elk really hasn't added any new traffic to what they already had. Look at how many new customers Lake State has gotten. Elks only mission is a reliable feeder to NS and what new customers come along pretty much rely on a lot of additional factors. She needed to keep her job interesting and Lake State responded. In fact MQT. better have a plan if CSX is no more, who they gonna interchange with? Haul the cars to Holland, Elk gets them or trackage rights? You know the STB will be involved if a sale is made.
On the contrary, if watco gets it they pick up all the customers between gr and plymouth and depending on what track goes with it, MQT would then solly interchange with the GDLK. Plus they may be able to feed LSRC cars from NS is Lake State gets the track south to plymouth. And the GDLK has many more customers than they did in 2009 and they are still getting more...

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 37904
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by AARR »

If Watco gets Plymouth to Grand Rapids they could use GLC (whom they have a financial investment with) to haul cars down from Ann Pere to Ann Arbor then Toledo. I don't know if this benefits them any :?
Waddy wrote:On the contrary, if watco gets it they pick up all the customers between gr and plymouth and depending on what track goes with it, MQT would then solly interchange with the GDLK. Plus they may be able to feed LSRC cars from NS is Lake State gets the track south to plymouth. And the GDLK has many more customers than they did in 2009 and they are still getting more...
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

MiRailProductions
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 337
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 6:19 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by MiRailProductions »

This is just my opinion, but I don't see the Grand Elk or any WATCO company taking the Plymouth Sub if CSX gets rid of it. The most likely contender I see is LSRC for the Plymouth Sub, with possibly GLC gaining more trackage rights.

Why would I say that? Well, a lot of GLC's traffic comes from Chicago, is brought to GR on Q326 for D707 to take to Lansing, where D708 can take it to Ann Pere. It'd be more efficient for a GLC crew to do GR-Ann Pere in one run, instead of two separate trains taking the responsibility. All it would take to make this happen is to get a couple more SD40s (which according to a crew member is being considered), and maybe some better track maintenance on the Ann Pere interchange point.

Another way the Ann Pere exchange could be handled more easily is if an LSRC crew takes the GLC-bound cars straight from GR to Ann Pere.
"If you are ever chasing trains, you're bound to end up on a 2-lane, double-striped road with a slow poke in front of you." -Danny Harmon
YouTube - Michigan Rail Productions
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPPgdn ... wZHDIyfk_Q

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15385
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by Saturnalia »

One thing for everybody to remember here is capital costs. Do the people you propose will be buying/leasing this stuff have the resources to do it?
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
Racer
Stops in Oncoming Traffic
Posts: 4365
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:40 pm
Location: Livonia, MI

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by Racer »

MQT3001 wrote:One thing for everybody to remember here is capital costs. Do the people you propose will be buying/leasing this stuff have the resources to do it?
....which is why CSX may very well just keep the line as long as the profit margin is decent and steady.
"...and I was in the front and Matt grabbed and pulled my ears from behind me and made horsey sounds."

User avatar
TSB
peon
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Florida

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by TSB »

It's a shame I am so old.

I love starting an operation from scratch
5 years on college faculties
34 years working on railroads

RR is more fun

User avatar
J3rsdm5
Speak softly and carry a big tripod
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 5:29 pm
Location: Chandler, AZ
Contact:

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by J3rsdm5 »

Racer wrote:
Saturnalia wrote:One thing for everybody to remember here is capital costs. Do the people you propose will be buying/leasing this stuff have the resources to do it?
....which is why CSX may very well just keep the line as long as the profit margin is decent and steady.
Whenever someone sells off a line, does the client tend to change things around a bit? For instance... ditch codeline?? :D :D
"If it ain't all red, it ain't red at all"
Image JJRicks Studios

User avatar
Doktor No
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 4:49 pm
Location: Rockford, Michigan

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by Doktor No »

MQT3001 wrote:One thing for everybody to remember here is capital costs. Do the people you propose will be buying/leasing this stuff have the resources to do it?
Thank you MQT. THATS the kicker here. Who has the CASH MONEY? The smaller guys would have to mortgage themselves to the hilt to do it IMHO. Install PTC? Do what with the old signals?
It's all speculation and my contacts say CSX isn't making any moves over Michigan at this time.
I was recalled from furlough in 92. I've been hearing about line sales up here since the mid 80's. Nothing has happened, NOTHING. Speculate all you want, that's all it is...pipe dreams, sandhouse talk...whatever.
Watch now, Wyandotte Southern will sign a lease tomorrow with monies from Detroit Connecting and Manny Maroon. 8-)
Curb Your Enthusiasm.

User avatar
justalurker66
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1964
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:51 am

Re: CSX reveal date?

Unread post by justalurker66 »

J3rsdm5 wrote:Whenever someone sells off a line, does the client tend to change things around a bit? For instance... ditch codeline?? :D :D
They can try ... but removing a signalling system is something that must be approved. GDLK tried to remove their signalling between Elkhart and Three Rivers (making the entire line dark except for interlockings controlled by others) and their request was denied. CTC survives (with codeline by leased line except for CP1 in Elkhart).

Post Reply