J T wrote:It's for the future when there are 30 freights and 4 passenger trains a day on that line.
J T wrote:It's for the future when there are 30 freights and 4 passenger trains a day on that line.

Big Frank wrote:J T wrote:It's for the future when there are 30 freights and 4 passenger trains a day on that line.
Wow the crack in GR must be really good these days lol
pica wrote:Does it seem weird to anyone else that they spent all the time and money to rebuild Novi Rd. over the CSX tracks in Novi. I mean seriously, how many trains do those tracks see a day.....3 maybe 4. And it's not like the trains were stopping blocking the road. Just seems like a waste of money to me.
AARR wrote:Not as useless as the bridge they built over an abnadoned ROW east of St. Johns when they rerouted M27.
When they were planning the bridge CMGN was operating the line. By the time they finally got around to building the brdige CMGN had abandoned the line (but the track may have been in place) so they went ahead with the expense of building the bridge even though there were no trains running.
They may have been thinking that the bridge could be used as an overpass to a densely populated bike path where thousands of pedestrians, bikers, and joggers would use to access St. Johns and keep its economy humming along and expanding like no industry could.
CSX_CO wrote:AARR wrote:Not as useless as the bridge they built over an abnadoned ROW east of St. Johns when they rerouted M27.
When they were planning the bridge CMGN was operating the line. By the time they finally got around to building the brdige CMGN had abandoned the line (but the track may have been in place) so they went ahead with the expense of building the bridge even though there were no trains running.
They may have been thinking that the bridge could be used as an overpass to a densely populated bike path where thousands of pedestrians, bikers, and joggers would use to access St. Johns and keep its economy humming along and expanding like no industry could.
I think until the RR is officially abandoned and property rights sorted out, they have to retain the overpass. I-69 had overpasses over the NYC Jackson Branch and PRR Eel River branches just outside of Auburn until the early 2000's. I want to say that the NYC between Auburn and Waterloo had been gone since the 50's or early 60's, so those lines had been gone for decades. Wasn't until they repaved/rebuilt that stretch in 2000/2001 did they remove the overpasses and smooth out the approaches.
Practice Safe CSX
conrailmike wrote:The reason for the overpass in Novi was because of the traffic during rush hour which is twice as bad when you get something through there like a coal train. Ever been on that stretch during rush hour?
PlymouthStationGuy wrote:Due to heavier traffic going to and coming from 12 Oaks Shopping Center area
and points north it just made sence to build a 4 lane bridge and it makes for better traffic flow. CSX had nothing to do with that bridge the money came from the stimulus that the state got for road improvment.
GTW6401 wrote:CSX has built a lot of new overpasses in the Metro Detroit area over the last 10 or 15 years, mostly around Livonia and Westland. Sheldon Road in Plymouth is a lot like the Novi Road bridge, being that it was built after most of the train traffic in the area had gone down.
Farm Lane in East Lansing didnt have any underpasses for how long until they were built a few years ago too.
Sheldon Road in Plymouth is a lot like the Novi Road bridge, being that it was built after most of the train traffic in the area had gone down.
Return to Chit Chat Babble Room
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], gonzojoe and 0 guests