End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Posts that don't fit in the other train categories. Off Subject Chit Chat I tell you. :)

End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby AARR on Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:01 pm

Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association
http://www.trainweb.org/annarbor/

Avatar picture posted with authorization by author and photographer, Jerry Pinkepank. Thanks to Michael D. Harding for getting approval.
User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
 
Posts: 20349
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby MQT3001 on Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:38 pm

In order to move to Natural Gas, we'll need pipelines, but we can't build those either :?
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/mqt3001
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/89601546@N02/

"The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything."
-Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
MQT3001
Thornapple River Kid
 
Posts: 6863
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby atrainguy60 on Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:42 pm

Can trains be used for natural gas movement?
atrainguy60
Saginaw Sub Foamer
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:54 pm

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby MQT3001 on Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:45 pm

atrainguy60 wrote:Can trains be used for natural gas movement?

Yes, but it's EXTREMELY inefficient. Pipelines move things constantly, while trains are one block at a time...
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/mqt3001
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/89601546@N02/

"The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything."
-Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
MQT3001
Thornapple River Kid
 
Posts: 6863
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby atrainguy60 on Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:55 pm

Yes, but it's EXTREMELY inefficient. Pipelines move things constantly, while trains are one block at a time...


They should use trains just because trains are cooler than pipelines.
atrainguy60
Saginaw Sub Foamer
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:54 pm

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby MQT3001 on Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:58 pm

atrainguy60 wrote:
Yes, but it's EXTREMELY inefficient. Pipelines move things constantly, while trains are one block at a time...


They should use trains just because trains are cooler than pipelines.

Fine, you pay for the extra billions per year....
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/mqt3001
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/89601546@N02/

"The only man who never makes a mistake is the man who never does anything."
-Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
MQT3001
Thornapple River Kid
 
Posts: 6863
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby 80mac on Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:01 pm

MQT3001 wrote:
atrainguy60 wrote:
Yes, but it's EXTREMELY inefficient. Pipelines move things constantly, while trains are one block at a time...


They should use trains just because trains are cooler than pipelines.

Fine, you pay for the extra billions per year....


Trust me with the EPA taking coal out of the mix we will all be paying for our electricity. Maybe not right away with the low NG prices we currently are seeing, but wait until the first cold winter :shock:
80mac
Railroadfan...fan
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:37 pm

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby Y@ on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:30 pm

80mac wrote:Maybe not right away with the low NG prices we currently are seeing, but wait until the first cold winter :shock:


After the winter we just had, I'm inclined to believe one of two things. Either, A.) This year was a complete fluke and we're going to get sh*t on next winter. Or, B.) It's never going to snow again.
Screw the trains, I come for the fighting.

RP: http://www.railpictures.net/WMHeilman
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/wyatt_heilman/
User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
 
Posts: 4981
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:37 pm

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby Jochs on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:40 pm

Y@ wrote:
80mac wrote:Maybe not right away with the low NG prices we currently are seeing, but wait until the first cold winter :shock:


After the winter we just had, I'm inclined to believe one of two things. Either, A.) This year was a complete fluke and we're going to get sh*t on next winter. Or, B.) It's never going to snow again.


Maybe this winter was to make up for last winter, as we here in S MI had about 10 ft of snow last winter, but the current winter so far has given us only about 2 ft. There's still some potential snowfall, as winter totals include Oct-May. April snow is not uncommon, and May snow is rare.
Jeff O.
User avatar
Jochs
Railroadfan...fan
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:52 pm
Location: Southwest MI

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby Y@ on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:43 pm

Jochs wrote:Maybe this winter was to make up for last winter, as we here in S MI had about 10 ft of snow last winter, but the current winter so far has given us only about 2 ft. There's still some potential snowfall, as winter totals include Oct-May. April snow is not uncommon, and May snow is rare.


Oh yeah, I'm sure we'll get some freak blizzard in the middle of April. Probably a good 6-8 feet of snow.
Screw the trains, I come for the fighting.

RP: http://www.railpictures.net/WMHeilman
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/wyatt_heilman/
User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
 
Posts: 4981
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:37 pm

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby GLC 392 on Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:49 pm

The end is near for Coal except for export it may not be tomorrow next year or even 10 years but it will be sooner then it should be. I see this at work our coal docks are not running at all due to power plants switching to NG and the Marcellus shale gas and even when i am near the NS they are down, in the last 4 months or so traffic has went down quite a bit coal wise including empties. we are hauling the pipe for the Shale gas to a plant that is doing the coating for the shale shale and NG pipe lines. People around here are getting offered 20 plus years worth of building pipelines if they want the job. The shortlines are hauling the fraqing sand as well and it is very very Big Business.

I saw a post/article on another board that steel mills are thinking of switch to NG to power the steel mills instead of coal which will take another big hit not so much where i work as everything we make uses coke(Even though Coke is made from coal) and coke gas but all the mines down south that ship to these mills will be hurting worse then they are now coal is already starting to make a down hill trip. Most steel mills still use coke to make the actual steel which will help out the mines a little bit not a lot but will help and to my knowledge coke burns hotter then NG i am not 100% sure though. The biggest coke burners that i know of are USS Great Lakes works, Gary Works, andMon Valley Work, Arcelor Mittal in Cleveland and also Burns Harbor, Coke is also now being shipped to a USS plant in Fairfield Al.

The Environmental Hippies are also going after the Carferry SS Badger that runs from Ludington to Milwaukee and it still burns coal, if they get their way it will stop burning coal and probably stop running all together which if this happens Steam Locomotives will be next on the chopping block.... i have my opinions about the EPA but they are to vocal for this board ;)
User avatar
GLC 392
TSBY/GLC KID
 
Posts: 2550
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:00 am
Location: S&M tower, Ludville.

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby J T on Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:19 pm

Oh my, how have we managed to survive all these years with the burning of coal.
User avatar
J T
Failed at Mocking
 
Posts: 7646
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby ns8401 on Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:21 pm

J T wrote:Oh my, how have we managed to survive all these years with the burning of coal.


I was born wearing a mask :lol: :lol: You?
Celebrating Over 2900 Posts in HD
This updated Signature Brought To YOU By The One The Only MQT3001!
User avatar
ns8401
Railroadfan...fan
 
Posts: 3164
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago, IL/Ann Arbor MI

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby J T on Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:26 pm

ns8401 wrote:
J T wrote:Oh my, how have we managed to survive all these years with the burning of coal.


I was born wearing a mask :lol: :lol: You?


You know, the air couldn't be any fresher in the West Olive area along the lakeshore. :D
User avatar
J T
Failed at Mocking
 
Posts: 7646
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby Jochs on Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:20 am

Y@ wrote:
Jochs wrote:Maybe this winter was to make up for last winter, as we here in S MI had about 10 ft of snow last winter, but the current winter so far has given us only about 2 ft. There's still some potential snowfall, as winter totals include Oct-May. April snow is not uncommon, and May snow is rare.


Oh yeah, I'm sure we'll get some freak blizzard in the middle of April. Probably a good 6-8 feet of snow.


I never said we were going to have 6 to 8 ft. of snow, but a snowstorm with several inches is not out of the question this time of the year. In 1993, in March, Atlanta was hit with a blizzard, which was only about 4 inches, but crippling for a Southern town.
http://web.me.com/atlwx/wxhistory/files/19930313-blizzard_93.html
Based on the weather this past winter, if it does snow again, it will be minor and melt within a few hours of the storm.
Jeff O.
User avatar
Jochs
Railroadfan...fan
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:52 pm
Location: Southwest MI

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby AARR on Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:39 am

It ticks me off to no end that the people who make our energy policy decisions do not have to live under their own mandates. If they are right then all will be well but if they are wrong, and in this current administrations case I believe they are wrong, we are left to suffer the consequences while they continue to live like royalty.

It must drive railroads nuts kissing the @$$ of this administration promoting their railroads as "green friendly" only to have the same administration stab them in the back by taking away a significant source of income/profit even though man-made global warming is only a theory and not scientifically proven.
Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association
http://www.trainweb.org/annarbor/

Avatar picture posted with authorization by author and photographer, Jerry Pinkepank. Thanks to Michael D. Harding for getting approval.
User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
 
Posts: 20349
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby J T on Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:41 am

Jochs wrote:In 1993, in March, Atlanta was hit with a blizzard, which was only about 4 inches, but crippling for a Southern town.

Dude, ONE inch is crippling for a southern town! :lol:
User avatar
J T
Failed at Mocking
 
Posts: 7646
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby CSX_CO on Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:09 am

GLC 392 wrote: I saw a post/article on another board that steel mills are thinking of switch to NG to power the steel mills instead of coal which will take another big hit not so much where i work as everything we make uses coke(Even though Coke is made from coal) and coke gas but all the mines down south that ship to these mills will be hurting worse then they are now coal is already starting to make a down hill trip. Most steel mills still use coke to make the actual steel which will help out the mines a little bit not a lot but will help and to my knowledge coke burns hotter then NG i am not 100% sure though.


Seeing as you work around the mills, you probably know this, but the coke is put in as an 'additive' to help give the melt of steel the correct carbon content as requested by the customer. GM Foundry in defiance would get coke too to give their castings the correct carbon content. Its 'pure' carbon, all the impurities (Sulphur, etc). Not sure how much the mills use it as a fuel? I believe there is another grade of 'coke' that might be better suited to burning. Met Coke maybe? INRD ships some of that out of Illinois (Robinson, IL IIRC) to Madison, WI for the U of W (MadGas) and its denser then the coke you see in the "Coke Express" hoppers.

I do know the coke plant in Indianapolis, when it was running, helped fire the boilers on the steam plant downtown. Bake the coal, capture the coke gasses from the top of the ovens, piped it downtown, and used it to help fire the steam boilers for the offices downtown. That's how "Citizens Gas" in Indianapolis got its start. City ran the coke plant, Citizens benefited from the 'free' gas off the process, and the city made some money on the coke.

Practice Safe CSX
CSX_CO
Railroadfan...fan
 
Posts: 1888
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby C30-7A on Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:04 am

Like Steven, I could be vocal about a few things (probably not the same things he's concerned with) but given the general intolerance for political stuff here, I shall refrain.

I will say these two things though:
1. I can't predict next winter, but I can say with some certainty this may become more of a norm over time...
2. Regardless of the shifting from coal to natural gas or any other energy policies, there is one thing we all need to remember that nobody here has brought up. Probably because nobody really wants to acknowledge it.
Coal (and oil and natural gas) is NOT an infinite resource. We WILL run out of it at some point. Then what do we do??
Regardless of your opinions on the EPA, it's better to start looking into or investing in alternative energy sources now than at the very last minute.

All I have to say.

Actually, a P.S. for Steven. The Badger was given an exemption from new policy so they can keep dumping coal ash into its harbors on Lake Michigan. It's safe for now.
If you can fly don't stop at the sky, 'cause there's footprints on the moon.
User avatar
C30-7A
Railroadfan...fan
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:13 am
Location: CP-147, Amtrak Michigan Line

Re: End of Coal Power Plants? EPA Proposes New Rules

Postby J T on Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:53 am

C30-7A wrote:1. I can't predict next winter, but I can say with some certainty this may become more of a norm over time...

And that certainty is based on what? We are one year removed from one of our snowiest winters (and it was pretty darn cold), yet you're using THIS year's model as a basis for future prediction? Interesting.
User avatar
J T
Failed at Mocking
 
Posts: 7646
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Next

Return to Chit Chat Babble Room

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alittlevanwerty, Google Adsense [Bot] and 1 guest