Well I guess we need to get the Road Commission records from them then. Do those records detail the entire life of the crossing over a certain year span? Does it detail what signals were there, how many tracks and whatnot?Raildudes dad wrote:There was no building there in 1956 when 28th St went from a 2 lane road to the present 5. The crossing did have signals prior to the widening. (based on the construction plans) I believe the current building is on part of the ROW. The ROW was 100 feet wide in 1956 - labeled NYC. I haven't had time to get into the old aerials.J T wrote:Any memory of what Kent Door & Specialty was back then? The existing building obviously got rail service way back when, as it's angled to match the ROW and has loading dock doors consistent with rail service. I drive by that building every day and try to imagine what it would have been like to have tracks passing by and crossing 28th.C&O6084 wrote:
I saw a NYC Geep crossing 28th street (flagmen & working lights/bell) when I was being kidnapped and forcibly taken downtown to get my shots for kindergarten; that was late Summer of 1964. 28th wasn't as built up then.
Edit: I'm reading the "About Us" section on Kent Door's website and it appears they moved in there in 1982. No mention of what it was prior to that.
I donated all the Road Commission crossing records for the line to the West Michigan RR Historical Society a few years ago. (Wyoming was a township until 1959 and the Road Commission maintained their streets for a number of years after that.)
LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
-
- Roadmaster
- Posts: 4753
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:12 am
- Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
The Road Commission did not have the records for 28th, it was a State Trunkline even back then. Only one track on the plan. RC records for the other roads, 44th etc. only had correspondence , no plans
- Ben Higdon
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
There's no way the GTW was interested in this track, and no way they were shoving a boxcar on it. PC and later Conrail both retained the former outside connections. Conrail operated the north end out Grand Rapids to Eagle Mills, and operated the south end as far north as Otsego.MQT1223 wrote:From a source I have apparently the GTW almost purchased this line after they sold off their connection. The GTW would shove a boxcar ahead in order to test the track to make sure the track would hold and flag for crossings. They never made it to Wyoming Yard because 28th street was paved over, and thus never purchased the line. I don't know how long the track survived after the PC last used it for anything, but this happened after the PC left the rails to rot before removal. Just an interesting little piece of info.
Penn Central stopped operating the line from Byron Center to somewhere around 28th St. I have a track chart that shows the road crossings along that stretch of track as being good for only 5 or 10mph. Perhaps the origin of the story you heard was the PC checking the track by shoving a boxcar before shoving in a cut of storage cars.
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
I doublechecked my source and he insists Grand Truck. They only got as far as 28th street because 28th had been paved over.Ben Higdon wrote:There's no way the GTW was interested in this track, and no way they were shoving a boxcar on it. PC and later Conrail both retained the former outside connections. Conrail operated the north end out Grand Rapids to Eagle Mills, and operated the south end as far north as Otsego.MQT1223 wrote:From a source I have apparently the GTW almost purchased this line after they sold off their connection. The GTW would shove a boxcar ahead in order to test the track to make sure the track would hold and flag for crossings. They never made it to Wyoming Yard because 28th street was paved over, and thus never purchased the line. I don't know how long the track survived after the PC last used it for anything, but this happened after the PC left the rails to rot before removal. Just an interesting little piece of info.
Penn Central stopped operating the line from Byron Center to somewhere around 28th St. I have a track chart that shows the road crossings along that stretch of track as being good for only 5 or 10mph. Perhaps the origin of the story you heard was the PC checking the track by shoving a boxcar before shoving in a cut of storage cars.
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
- Ben Higdon
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
How did a GTW loco get to be south of Grand Rapids on the old NYC?
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
Went from Kzoo north.Ben Higdon wrote:How did a GTW loco get to be south of Grand Rapids on the old NYC?
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
I don't know the exact connection but the GTW does go to Battle Creek so they must have had access to what is now the Grand Elk Railroad somehow.Ben Higdon wrote:How did a GTW loco get to be south of Grand Rapids on the old NYC?
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
- amtrak1007
- MP 25 Productions Co-Founder
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:55 am
- Location: Fisher FB97
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
My Lamar photo from the 50's
- Ben Higdon
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
That tower sure had a lot of levers for controlling that junction. Must've controlled signals and switches for the west leads of Wyoming Yard where they entered the C&O main immediately east of the junction?
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
Nice. Any evidence still around of this existing or did the Chessie wipe it clean off the face of the earth? Any pictures from any recognizable locations such as Prairie or 28th street or others?amtrak1007 wrote:
My Lamar photo from the 50's
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
- amtrak1007
- MP 25 Productions Co-Founder
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:55 am
- Location: Fisher FB97
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
http://gllx3001facts.com/maps/GrandRapidsTerminal.pdf
Page 6 here I drew in pencil where I think the LS&MS crossed the PM main, as you can see there were several crossovers and signals controlled by the tower.
Page 6 here I drew in pencil where I think the LS&MS crossed the PM main, as you can see there were several crossovers and signals controlled by the tower.
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
You can see the alignment of the old LS&MS crossing Chicago drive because the truck dealer's front wall at Byron Center and Chicago follows the same alignment. The building is not built on the rail bed, but if you look south of the building on the left side of Byron Center you will see a row of trees on the edge of Lamar Park. The railroad would've been on the park side of that row of trees. The row of trees was the east side of the rail bed.amtrak1007 wrote:http://gllx3001facts.com/maps/GrandRapidsTerminal.pdf
Page 6 here I drew in pencil where I think the LS&MS crossed the PM main, as you can see there were several crossovers and signals controlled by the tower.
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
- Proto48Patrick
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:06 pm
- Location: Kalamazoo
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
MQT1223 wrote:I don't know the exact connection but the GTW does go to Battle Creek so they must have had access to what is now the Grand Elk Railroad somehow.Ben Higdon wrote:How did a GTW loco get to be south of Grand Rapids on the old NYC?
Pere MQT1223,
I'm guessing that they shoved the executive train north through Plainwell and the GTW CEO was the "Brakeman of Honor" that day. That makes all the sense in the world. Since they were the executive train, they were full of badassery that they could go as far north as they wanted. The Union gave him full honors for the day and he was so kickass that he didn't need to flag the paved-over crossings.
True Story, I read it online.
Patrick
Patrick Welch
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
It looks like there's a diamond in that picture, but then again it looks like there's not a diamond. What's going on in that pic?amtrak1007 wrote:
My Lamar photo from the 50's
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimthias/
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.
GRHC - you know every night I can imagine he is in front of his computer screen sitting in his underwear swearing profusely and drinking Blatz beer combing the RailRoadFan website for grammatical errors.
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
MQT1223 wrote:
From a source I have apparently the GTW almost purchased this line after they sold off their connection. The GTW would shove a boxcar ahead in order to test the track to make sure the track would hold and flag for crossings. They never made it to Wyoming Yard because 28th street was paved over, and thus never purchased the line. I don't know how long the track survived after the PC last used it for anything, but this happened after the PC left the rails to rot before removal. Just an interesting little piece of info.
So a little asphalt held up a major rail line purchase? That's almost as plausible as GTW buying the line to begin with. I would be interested to hear what other insights your source has for us...
From a source I have apparently the GTW almost purchased this line after they sold off their connection. The GTW would shove a boxcar ahead in order to test the track to make sure the track would hold and flag for crossings. They never made it to Wyoming Yard because 28th street was paved over, and thus never purchased the line. I don't know how long the track survived after the PC last used it for anything, but this happened after the PC left the rails to rot before removal. Just an interesting little piece of info.
So a little asphalt held up a major rail line purchase? That's almost as plausible as GTW buying the line to begin with. I would be interested to hear what other insights your source has for us...
"Let's keep the freight rolling, gentlemen..."
- amtrak1007
- MP 25 Productions Co-Founder
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:55 am
- Location: Fisher FB97
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
J T wrote: It looks like there's a diamond in that picture, but then again it looks like there's not a diamond. What's going on in that pic?
There is a diamond in the shot, also a set off track for a speeder, which makes it look like the diamond isn't there. The set off track is the lower left of the frame, the diamond trackage is promptly above it in the shot.
Agreed.run8ed wrote: So a little asphalt held up a major rail line purchase? That's almost as plausible as GTW buying the line to begin with. I would be interested to hear what other insights your source has for us...
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
Well by that time over 30 years of deferred maintenance had the line in a bad state of disrepair, apparently too bad to make it worth it. Keep in mind the NYC and later Penn Central had the line up to Grand Rapids that paralleled the Pennsy, old GR&I line from the south. This line was not necessary, as it was abandoned first before the GR&I south of Grand Rapids when the Penn Central came around (They kept the NYC tracks that paralleled the GR&I). Plus the NYC tried for years to spur up business along the old LS&MS with no customers springing up. The line was barely usable for storage when it was ripped out (from what I hear). This line's heyday was when the LS&MS had it as their mainline into GR, and after the LS&MS merging with the NYC&HRR to form the NYC. When the NYC bought the ex. interurban tracks (line over Market St./Grand River, etc.) this line's purpose was greatly diminished. That purchase was in the mid 30's if I remember correctly from the interurban presentation a few weeks ago. Correct me if I am wrong on any of this, but I am pretty sure that was the death blow for the old LS&MS line.amtrak1007 wrote:J T wrote: It looks like there's a diamond in that picture, but then again it looks like there's not a diamond. What's going on in that pic?
There is a diamond in the shot, also a set off track for a speeder, which makes it look like the diamond isn't there. The set off track is the lower left of the frame, the diamond trackage is promptly above it in the shot.
Agreed.run8ed wrote: So a little asphalt held up a major rail line purchase? That's almost as plausible as GTW buying the line to begin with. I would be interested to hear what other insights your source has for us...
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
- Ben Higdon
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
Heh?MQT1223 wrote:(They kept the NYC tracks that paralleled the GR&I).
What did the interurban trackage in Grand Rapids have to do with the usefulness of the LSMS?MQT1223 wrote: When the NYC bought the ex. interurban tracks (line over Market St./Grand River, etc.) this line's purpose was greatly diminished. That purchase was in the mid 30's if I remember correctly from the interurban presentation a few weeks ago. Correct me if I am wrong on any of this, but I am pretty sure that was the death blow for the old LS&MS line.
- MQT1223
- O Scale Railfanner
- Posts: 4028
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
- Location: Grandville, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
The NYC bought the old Interurban trackage to have a more direct route into GR if I remember correctly... before that the LS&MS line was the NYC's only way in or trackage rights over the Pennsy, which of course the NYC didn't like. Plus like I said, the NYC and PC had issues trying to spur up business on the line and it was not economical to keep the line.Ben Higdon wrote:Heh?MQT1223 wrote:(They kept the NYC tracks that paralleled the GR&I).
Didn't the PC rip out the GR&I main and instead keep the NYC tracks that ran next to it down to Kzoo and points beyond? I thought that's what the current GDLK yard's original heritage is because the Pennsy yard and tracks are gone.
What did the interurban trackage in Grand Rapids have to do with the usefulness of the LSMS?MQT1223 wrote: When the NYC bought the ex. interurban tracks (line over Market St./Grand River, etc.) this line's purpose was greatly diminished. That purchase was in the mid 30's if I remember correctly from the interurban presentation a few weeks ago. Correct me if I am wrong on any of this, but I am pretty sure that was the death blow for the old LS&MS line.
Maybe someone with more knowledge of this whole issue could chime in. I may be 18 but my memory is terrible and it seems like everyone has a different story on the line. Plus all I know is what I have learned in the past 5 years. I can't find any real accurate records or info on the lines' history.
1223 OUT! President and Founder of the Buck Creek Central, the Rolling River Route! (2012-2017) President and Founder of the Lamberton Valley Railroad, The Tin Plate Road! Proudly railfanning with Asperger's since 1996.
Re: LS&MS Grand Rapids Division Pics
Part of the problem the LSMS route posed for the NYC is that its terminal was on the West Side of GR, disconnected from the NYC's (Michigan Central) roundhouse and facilities near Hall St, so locomotive servicing and other connections required a move over the PRR, not real convenient. Towards the end, the NYC ran north out of Kalamazoo on the LSMS only as far as Byron Center for produce loading and an occasional car of lumber for Rynbrandt's Hardware. When that business dried up in the early '70s it was a no-brainer for PC to pull out in favor of the much shorter GR&I between GR and Kalamazoo.