Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Any historical questions can be posted here. Answers would certainly help as well :)
GP30M4216
Saver of all History
Posts: 5203
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 10:35 pm
Location: Feel the Zeel, MI
Contact:

Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by GP30M4216 »

Question for the group: what is the history of this connecting line between the AA west of town and the former GR&I yard and mainline heading north out of town? Was this line always here before the AA and GR&I were unified into the TSBY operation, or was this a newer construction? It seems like a complex operation to have to run around their train to switch from the Annie to head north onto the GR&I, or vice versa. It seems maintaining the GR&I route through downtown from the diamond site up to the yard would have been much more advantageous and expedient. Was there once a connection track at the AA-GR&I diamond site south of downtown?
IMG_9243.jpeg

User avatar
pudgy
King Ding-a-ling
Posts: 1263
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:11 am

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by pudgy »

Looks like it was built by the TSBY after consolidating operations.

https://rail.guide/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW ... /-85.40941
Attachments
Screenshot_20250509-222059.png
Just a Fat Guy

User avatar
Ben Higdon
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 853
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by Ben Higdon »

I’ve wondered about this line before. It appears to be an industrial track of the PRR which crossed the AA. The wye tail track on the AA is part of the alignment. If you look at the oldest (1954) aerial on historicaerials, the roundhouse lead, and a property line just north of the oval track at the fairgrounds, also lines up. Perhaps it was an unbuilt ROW that PRR acquired for industrial track within the city. Seems like I’ve seen documentation that PRR and AA shared it but I could be wrong.

User avatar
AARR
Incognito and Irrelevant
Posts: 40081
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by AARR »

This was the Cadillac Beltline. For many years AA and PRR alternated years switching the customers on it. That's about all I can remember right now.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

AANscaleRunner
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3016
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:06 pm
Location: Cadillac Michigan

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by AANscaleRunner »

Image

Cadillac and Northeastern Railroad, owned by Cummer Lumber Company. Ran approximately 13 miles from Cadillac to Lake City from 1884 to 1900. The track between the Ann Arbor and the Grand Rapids and Indiana was transferred to the GRI around that time. I'm assuming the wye was transferred to the GRI or Ann Arbor at that time also. Information from the various railroad books written by Graydon M. Meints. I highly recommended them as reference sources for Michigan railroads.
Attachments
20250511_073452.jpg
Last edited by AANscaleRunner on Sun May 11, 2025 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Erroneous Monk
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:35 pm
Location: The Water Tower

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by Erroneous Monk »

GP30M4216 wrote:
Tue May 06, 2025 12:08 am
It seems like a complex operation to have to run around their train to switch from the Annie to head north onto the GR&I, or vice versa. It seems maintaining the GR&I route through downtown from the diamond site up to the yard would have been much more advantageous and expedient.
Seeing as Cadillac has primarily acted as an origination and terminating station in the TSBY/GLC era this set up actually makes more sense. Retaining the GR&I line and removing this route allows for through freight but makes accessing both the Annie and GR&I yards much harder. Under GLC the two yards coexist and are used on a very regular basis and thus quick access to each is preferred. GLC either runs north or south from Caddy with their local freight but almost never through it. In a perfect world both connections would probably be retained but in this case, prioritizing yard access saves much more time than favoring through runs.

I believe the only through trains in Cadillac recently have been to the Yuma sand mine, which would have bypassed the connector entirely.

User avatar
MQT1223
O Scale Railfanner
Posts: 4462
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
Location: Grandville, Michigan
Contact:

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by MQT1223 »

AANscaleRunner wrote:
Sun May 11, 2025 7:58 am
Image

Cadillac and Northeastern Railroad, owned by Cummer Lumber Company. Ran approximately 13 miles from Cadillac to Lake City from 1884 to 1900. The track between the Ann Arbor and the Grand Rapids and Indiana was transferred to the GRI around that time. I'm assuming the wye was transferred to the GRI or Ann Arbor at that time also. Information from the various railroad books written by Graydon M. Meints. I highly recommended them as reference sources for Michigan railroads.
What track ran to the NW in this image?
www.youtube.com/@PereMarquette1223

Founder of the Buck Creek Central (2012-2017)

joeyuboats
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 10:25 am

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by joeyuboats »

I believe it was ANN ARBOR, on its way to Frankfort/Elberta.The north- south line was PRR/ PC.

User avatar
AARR
Incognito and Irrelevant
Posts: 40081
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by AARR »

joeyuboats wrote:
Sat May 17, 2025 6:50 pm
I believe it was ANN ARBOR, on its way to Frankfort/Elberta.The north- south line was PRR/ PC.
I think he’s referring to the line above the AA line. The AA line runs west out of Cadillac.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

AANscaleRunner
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3016
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:06 pm
Location: Cadillac Michigan

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by AANscaleRunner »

MQT1223 wrote:
Sat May 17, 2025 6:13 pm
What track ran to the NW in this image?
That should be the Cummer and Diggins logging railroad. It snaked its way northwest towards Mesick, roughly following where M-115 is today. It may also have branched off towards Hoxeyville in the southwest corner of Wexford County.

User avatar
MQT1223
O Scale Railfanner
Posts: 4462
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
Location: Grandville, Michigan
Contact:

Re: Cadillac, MI trackage history question

Unread post by MQT1223 »

AANscaleRunner wrote:
Sun May 18, 2025 8:10 am
MQT1223 wrote:
Sat May 17, 2025 6:13 pm
What track ran to the NW in this image?
That should be the Cummer and Diggins logging railroad. It snaked its way northwest towards Mesick, roughly following where M-115 is today. It may also have branched off towards Hoxeyville in the southwest corner of Wexford County.
There are a few places where it looks like a railroad grade crosses M-115 as you head towards Mesick... did they basically build over the logging line with M-115?
www.youtube.com/@PereMarquette1223

Founder of the Buck Creek Central (2012-2017)

Post Reply