Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Give us a run down of what you saw, post pictures if you'd like...any info is welcome.
User avatar
Tier4GEVO
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 9:43 pm
Location: Michigan

Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by Tier4GEVO »

CSX Q384-06 had a portion of its power plucked and placed onto a string of cars just west of Levan Road in Livonia, MI.
ImageConfusion by AmericanRailfan, on Flickr

CSX Q385-04 stops just short of the Lilley Road grade crossing in Plymouth, Michigan as it prepares to do hours and hours of work as it drops off and picks up new cars. Also note that TORC 996 is the third unit of the lashup.
ImageStopped For Hours by AmericanRailfan, on Flickr

A solo CSX GP38-2S prepares to enter the Toledo wye and head south.
ImageNo Cars by AmericanRailfan, on Flickr

User avatar
KVERBERK
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 571
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:55 am
Location: Da U.P.

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by KVERBERK »

Nice shots. Thanks for sharing
Up North TSBY/GLC Fan

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 37909
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by AARR »

The GP38-2S looks like it has 3 radiator fans
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 15385
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan City, IN
Contact:

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by Saturnalia »

AARR wrote:The GP38-2S looks like it has 3 radiator fans
That's because it is a GP40-2 downrated to 2000hp
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 37909
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by AARR »

Does it still have a turbo charger?
Saturnalia wrote:
AARR wrote:The GP38-2S looks like it has 3 radiator fans
That's because it is a GP40-2 downrated to 2000hp
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10431
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by SD80MAC »

AARR wrote:Does it still have a turbo charger?
Saturnalia wrote:
AARR wrote:The GP38-2S looks like it has 3 radiator fans
That's because it is a GP40-2 downrated to 2000hp
Yes. It’s just a GP40-2 de-tuned to 2000 HP. They didn’t change anything externally or even renumber them.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 37909
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by AARR »

Thanks 80MAC and Saturn.
SD80MAC wrote:Does it still have a turbo charger?
The GP38-2S looks like it has 3 radiator fans
That's because it is a GP40-2 downrated to 2000hp
Yes. It’s just a GP40-2 de-tuned to 2000 HP. They didn’t change anything externally or even renumber them.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

hoborich
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2992
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:05 am
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by hoborich »

Question. What is the reason for detuning a loco. Looks like they give up 1000 hp doing this.
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10431
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Fuel efficiency I'm sure was the main concern, engine uses less fuel putting out 2,000 HP vs. 3,000. GP40-2s were also built to be relatively fast freight units, which is what they were generally used for until more modern 6 axles started displacing them in the 80s and 90s. Today they are used in local and yard service interchangeably with other Geeps, but they are not as well suited for switching as say a GP38-2. At 3,000 HP, a GP40-2 is more slippery at low speeds than a lower HP Geep. I can't tell you how many times I had a GP38-2/GP40-2 combo for switching and when pulling on a big cut of cars, the 40's wheels would break loose and spin while the 38 just dug in. Sort of the same story for the 6 axle versions, SD38s excelled at low speed lugging, which is why RRs like the EJ&E, B&LE and DMIR bought them over the SD40.

In short, the GP38-2S program was an attempt to make a GP40-2 more comparable to a GP38-2. How well this was accomplished, I don't really know, but they didn't convert many units, so I would guess marginal at best. CSX also derated some SD40-2s as well, calling them SD38-2Ss.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

hoborich
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2992
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:05 am
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: Plymouth Area on 11/7/2017

Unread post by hoborich »

Makes perfect sense. Thanks for the explanation.
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".

Post Reply