Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City, Mi

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Michigan.
User avatar
KingsleyRailFan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:01 am
Location: Kingsley, Michigan

Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City, Mi

Unread post by KingsleyRailFan »

Last night GLC 398 was going towards Cadillac yard and it became stuck at a crossing blocking the road for approximately 6 hours. It eventually was freed and continued on its route at approximatly 11:11 PM, 6 hours later than usual
I live in Kingsley and film trains & crossings.

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 8400
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by SD80MAC »

The video I saw was of GLC 329.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 32165
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by AARR »

From TC John at MichiganRailroads.com
Stuck again!!

Posted by TC John on 2/15/2019, 2:21 pm, in reply to "GLC back in TC again today"

GLC has 329 and another (399??) blocking Woodmere for the last 1.5 hours. Woodmere closed at the tracks. This crossing they went through twice yesterday, so unsure if they are stuck or off the rails. I'd think if only stuck, they could uncouple and move one loco and the lumber loads...Seems they really need the plow or spreader up here.
KingsleyRailFan wrote:Last night GLC 398 was going towards Cadillac yard and it became stuck at a crossing blocking the road for approximately 6 hours. It eventually was freed and continued on its route at approximatly 11:11 PM, 6 hours later than usual
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

hoborich
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:05 am
Location: Northern Michigan

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by hoborich »

How do two locos get stuck in the snow?
"Ask your doctor if medical advice from a TV commercial is right for you".

User avatar
KingsleyRailFan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:01 am
Location: Kingsley, Michigan

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by KingsleyRailFan »

SD80MAC wrote:The video I saw was of GLC 329.
I'm looking at a facebook video I was sent and the 2 looked like a 9, guess it was 329. First time in a while a train's gotten stuck on the TC line, usually the major stuff happens on the Kalkaska sub.

Edit: Video of the worst accident in this area in a while, other being a collision with a car [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl2ptd8tVBk[/youtube]
I live in Kingsley and film trains & crossings.

Jeff Smith
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Attica, MI

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by Jeff Smith »


Super Chief
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:53 am
Location: Three Rivers, Mi.--Indian Rocks Beach,Fl.

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by Super Chief »

Where did the 8 come into play? The way this is worded is it stuck in Cadillac or Traverse City? If in TC then the track work must be done to support 6 axles in town? I see SRI is using LV 126 up north for trips out of Kalkaska in April. Would think 1225 is still restricted to south of Cadillac?

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 8400
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Super Chief wrote:Where did the 8 come into play? The way this is worded is it stuck in Cadillac or Traverse City? If in TC then the track work must be done to support 6 axles in town? I see SRI is using LV 126 up north for trips out of Kalkaska in April. Would think 1225 is still restricted to south of Cadillac?
They've been using the SD40s on the TC branch since they got them last spring.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

Super Chief
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:53 am
Location: Three Rivers, Mi.--Indian Rocks Beach,Fl.

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by Super Chief »

Thanks SD80MAC, seems like overkill for power but it is what it is.

chapmaja
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 799
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:02 pm

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by chapmaja »

Super Chief wrote:Thanks SD80MAC, seems like overkill for power but it is what it is.
I think it depends on what power is available for them. Also, it might be that they are thinking 2 SD40-2's will accomplish the same work as one of the GP's. Unfortunately that may also include getting stuck.

NS3322
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 787
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 1:08 pm
Location: CP-LEVITT

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by NS3322 »

Super Chief wrote:I see SRI is using LV 126 up north for trips out of Kalkaska in April. Would think 1225 is still restricted to south of Cadillac?
Has the #1225 ever visited TC? Or have the tracks always been that poor?

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13901
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan's Copper Country
Contact:

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by Saturnalia »

NS3322 wrote:
Super Chief wrote:I see SRI is using LV 126 up north for trips out of Kalkaska in April. Would think 1225 is still restricted to south of Cadillac?
Has the #1225 ever visited TC? Or have the tracks always been that poor?
Not really based on track conditions. The Manistee River Bridge is not rated to handle the 1225's weight.

User avatar
Standard Railfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:25 pm
Location: Marquette, MI

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by Standard Railfan »

Saturnalia wrote: Not really based on track conditions. The Manistee River Bridge is not rated to handle the 1225's weight.
I am not convinced that the Manisree river bridge is the constraint, the PRR had severe restrictions on locomotive weights north of Grand Rapids. That being said there is photographic evidence of Baldwin DR-12-8 (Centipede) running in pairs on the Northern Arrow to Mackinaw City.

One DR-12-8 weighs about 600,000 lbs. A pair would be about 1,200,000 lbs. The 1225 with tender is about 800,000 lbs. I didn’t calculate the axle loading, but there can’t be much difference.

The Traverse City branch historically was both weight and speed restricted. I can not locate the timetable copy at the moment but I recall reading that the speed limit for passenger trains on the branch was 10 mph prior to the 1950s. I assume the the line was lightly built and never upgraded. The appearance of the remaking line north of the tunnels on Keystone Road would support this theory.
Some others on this board may have first hand knowledge, but my understanding is that the TC branch has always been a marginal line.

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13901
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan's Copper Country
Contact:

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Standard Railfan wrote:
Saturnalia wrote: Not really based on track conditions. The Manistee River Bridge is not rated to handle the 1225's weight.
I am not convinced that the Manisree river bridge is the constraint, the PRR had severe restrictions on locomotive weights north of Grand Rapids.
I should have quantified: that is the consensus. Many people (including some who'd be considered reliable sources) have said the above over the years and I've never seen or heard anybody refute the claim. Nobody has ever produced a "the bridge weight limit is blank" or made any other moves to quantify it.

kenN
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 158
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:26 pm
Location: Cutlerville MI

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by kenN »

I'd love to see a picture of the Centipedes on the North end. I know that the PRR M-class 4-8-2 and I-class 2-10-0 were too heavy to go north of GR, let alone TC. The lighter USRA N-class 2-10-2s were the biggest steam locos permitted north to Mackinaw; don't know if they could go to TC.

Super Chief
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:53 am
Location: Three Rivers, Mi.--Indian Rocks Beach,Fl.

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by Super Chief »

Having personally rode over the bridge in one of the Alco-trucked GP-35s, pulling an excursion the bridge has a 10mph speed restriction as you can actually feel it move under you. The crews know not to exceed that. Maybe someone else on this thread knows what that bidge and the US-131 overhead bridge at Fife Lake has for tonnage ratings?

JStryker722
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 654
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:52 am
Location: Inkster,MI

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by JStryker722 »

I was up there this past weekend on a get-a-way and couldn't figure this out even with Google Maps: is Williamsburg end-of-track or is that how trains get into TC?
My Wife says my first love is trains..anint that the truth! Lol :D

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 32165
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by AARR »

Trains arrive in Traverse City from the southeast. The line to Williamsburg goes due east out of Traverse City. The two lines connect near the Traverse City station.
JStryker722 wrote:I was up there this past weekend on a get-a-way and couldn't figure this out even with Google Maps: is Williamsburg end-of-track or is that how trains get into TC?
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
TSB
peon
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by TSB »

Back in TSB days, most trouble with engines at crossings were the result of "grooming" the right-of-way for snowmobiles.

The groomers piled snow over the tracks until it became compacted and ice.

Eight inches or more of ice will skate a loco off the tracks.

Very dangerous for the crews and anyone else that comes near.
5 years on college faculties
34 years working on railroads

RR is more fun

User avatar
Standard Railfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1507
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:25 pm
Location: Marquette, MI

Re: Great Lakes Central 398 Stuck in Snow in Traverse City,

Unread post by Standard Railfan »

kenN wrote:I'd love to see a picture of the Centipedes on the North end. I know that the PRR M-class 4-8-2 and I-class 2-10-0 were too heavy to go north of GR, let alone TC. The lighter USRA N-class 2-10-2s were the biggest steam locos permitted north to Mackinaw; don't know if they could go to TC.
Just a few clicks away. http://www.michiganrailroads.com/statio ... rp-lake-mi

Post Reply