MAW vs. CSX Case Decision (UPDATE 2-2-08)

Anything pertaining to railfanning in Ohio.
User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38017
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Unread post by AARR »

There's only one customer they will serve by reinstalling the diamond? Possibly a second if the can get the elevator to go back to rail service? The MAW track looks rough...
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
Posts: 5588
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:37 pm

Unread post by Y@ »

Don, there are several new buisnesses opening up along the MAW Right Of Way in the Industrial District that they will be able to serve, plus the Elevator in Antwerp, scrap metal from Cecil, and the NS interchange.
Bottom text.

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38017
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Unread post by AARR »

Thanks Y@. I must have misunderstood whatever it is I read.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

jukeman
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:16 pm

Unread post by jukeman »

Matt, read my post again I said the photos that Greg posted.....from Walkerton.

sd70accsxt700
Sofa King follower
Posts: 6159
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Toledo, OH.

Unread post by sd70accsxt700 »

Dennis I know that, but according to the post about the diamonds before, and comments on the photos, those were supposed to be "fly over" diamonds, but there not.
https://flic.kr/ps/jSuAb My Flickr photos!

jukeman
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:16 pm

Unread post by jukeman »

OK, My comment had nothing to do with those. Mine was concerning fly overs to be installed at Durand being like the ones at Walkerton. Which has nothing to do with the ones at Defiance in original post
http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=870062

RailCanon
BANHAMMERED
Posts: 2327
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:26 am
Location: East Lansing, MI
Contact:

Unread post by RailCanon »

Per a post on Trainorders, the MAW finally used the diamonds for the first time this Wednesday (--1/2/08--). The move involved shoving a large cut of 43 autoracks across the CSX line for storage. Sounds as though more are on the way.

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38017
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Unread post by AARR »

So the crossing was reinstalled to store cars? :shock:
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38017
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Unread post by AARR »

I realize what I posted above is not the case but in railroading would it surprise anyone if after all the costs of lawyers the segment accessed by the crossing turns out to be used to store cars rather than serve active customers :roll:
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
Posts: 5588
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:37 pm

Unread post by Y@ »

Wow... Now this is strange. I have no idea where they would be storing cars at, and I had no idea the track was even good enough to run cars as big as autoracks over it!
Bottom text.

sd70accsxt700
Sofa King follower
Posts: 6159
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Toledo, OH.

Unread post by sd70accsxt700 »

No Don no not at all,
https://flic.kr/ps/jSuAb My Flickr photos!

CSX_CO
Over and Out
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Unread post by CSX_CO »

Don Simon wrote:I realize what I posted above is not the case but in railroading would it surprise anyone if after all the costs of lawyers the segment accessed by the crossing turns out to be used to store cars rather than serve active customers :roll:
There is probably more money in storing cars then serving customers. You park the cars and leave them. You send a bill to TTX and you get paid. You make money by doing nothing.

Working a customer requires locomotives (all associated expenses), crews (and all associated expenses), and you only get a portion of the revenue from moving that car.

KBS makes a living storing cars on the various sidings on their railroad.

Of course, unless there is a siding west of the diamond (which I don't think there is), the main line they wanted back soooo badly is now effectively blocked again.

Practice Safe CSX

CSX_CO
Over and Out
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Unread post by CSX_CO »

Y@ Heilman wrote:Wow... Now this is strange. I have no idea where they would be storing cars at, and I had no idea the track was even good enough to run cars as big as autoracks over it!
Probably storing them right on the main between crossings. That would be my guess. So much for their 'grand plans' of having a real main line right?

As long as you go slow enough you avoid a lot of problems. Autoracks are not that heavy so you don't have to really worry about the rail rolling over.

I'm surprised they made it around the connection off the CSX and onto the MAW! That always seemed like a tight fit there at FC.

Practice Safe CSX

hobojim
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 1:30 pm
Location: Beaverton, Mi.

Unread post by hobojim »

An autorack is essentially a box of air. Even loaded they are light compared to other cars. I have seen on many occasions a train of 80-120 autoracks come thru Durand being pulled by only one engine. On one occasion it was pulled by a single SD-40-2.


Jim

User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
Posts: 5588
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:37 pm

Unread post by Y@ »

I can understand how light autoracks really are, but remember, this is the original 65-pound rail rolled in 1915... Those weren't built for autoracks. But I guess it worked because I didn't hear anything of a crash.

Secondly, I'm going to try and find out tomorrow where they're being stored at for sure. I could see them storing them in the siding at Antwerp, and now that I think of it, even at the end of the line in Woodburn.
Bottom text.

User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
Posts: 5588
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:37 pm

Unread post by Y@ »

2-2-08

The MAW pulled all 40 autoracks out from storage Saturday, using ex-Santa Fe GP7u 5. They were interchanged to CSX almost immediatley. After GP38-2 2806 pulled them to the GM Plant Yard, they were dropped on track 3. I expect that Q508-03 or Q508-04 picked them up and took them back to Toledo.

I guess this means the demand is back, but what does it mean for the MAW? I'm almost sure there won't be anymore autoracks coming in to be placed in storage, but there could be other equipment.
Bottom text.

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 38017
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Unread post by AARR »

I would have thought they had customers ready to go before going through the expense and headache of a law suit to reinstall the crossing. I guess in time we'll see their plan.
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

Post Reply