CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Daily whereabouts of train locations along with sightings for heads ups to other railfans.
User avatar
Jetlink
Not a Railfan
Posts: 3137
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:41 pm
Location: 2.5 miles from CH 116.3

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Jetlink »

Q329 at Woodbury 10:45 am. CSX 5477 and 3434 leading. I didn’t count cars but well over 100.
interested in trains

Tom49801
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Tom49801 »

Jetlink wrote:Q329 at Woodbury 10:45 am. CSX 5477 and 3434 leading. I didn’t count cars but well over 100.
Q329 reported by the DD at mp CH126.3 @ 11:07am with 480 axles & 7,300 feet long. 117 cars for the typical axle math.

Tom49801
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Tom49801 »

E800-23 with BNSF engine #8400 appears to be at Wells Siding mp CG43.3 @ 13:30 & probably dropping off the pusher engines. Heard him reporting from the east end of Wells but should have gone over DD44.2 a few minutes ago.
​DD44.2 reporting E800-23 @ 14:49 with 644 & 9,482 feet long. BNSF engine #8400 + 1 & 158 cars. No idea what the extra cars are until he arrives Bangor in a few.
​E800-23 at Bangor mp CG60.7 @ 15:07:15 with BNSF engines #8400 + #8479, 43 Inter-modal empties, followed by 131 empty coal cars. ​Saw a darker coal empty different from the rest, #RWSX 94587. He cleared the St Joseph Bridge @ 16:04

User avatar
justin_gram
Authority on Rabbit
Posts: 4432
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 7:45 pm
Location: 91.9 DD
Contact:

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by justin_gram »

E80023 around Vine currently.

User avatar
TSS
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 151
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:58 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, MI

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by TSS »

Tom49801 wrote: ​E800-23 at Bangor mp CG60.7 @ 15:07:15 with BNSF engines #8400 + #8479, 43 Inter-modal empties, followed by 131 empty coal cars.
Just saw it go past Glenlord.

I love how CSX has quit pretending this is anything other than a backwater operation. Got some TOFC empties that need to go back to the BNSF? Stick ‘em on the front of the coal empties. Why not!

Got a repaired bad order car on a spur with a six axle restriction and D700 has six axle power and only a couple cars? Why, have Q326 stop and use a dozen cars to grab the the car that needs to be picked up. What else would you do with the hottest train on the railroad?!

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 8406
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by SD80MAC »

TSS wrote:
Tom49801 wrote: ​E800-23 at Bangor mp CG60.7 @ 15:07:15 with BNSF engines #8400 + #8479, 43 Inter-modal empties, followed by 131 empty coal cars.
Just saw it go past Glenlord.

I love how CSX has quit pretending this is anything other than a backwater operation. Got some TOFC empties that need to go back to the BNSF? Stick ‘em on the front of the coal empties. Why not!

Got a repaired bad order car on a spur with a six axle restriction and D700 has six axle power and only a couple cars? Why, have Q326 stop and use a dozen cars to grab the the car that needs to be picked up. What else would you do with the hottest train on the railroad?!
?????

The coal trains already go right past CSX's 59th St intermodal yard and right to the BNSF. Why burn an extra crew and extra locomotives when you already have a train going there? Sending them via Q327 would take them to Barr yard, which would clog that yard with unnecessary cars and require another crew to bring them to the BNSF.

D700 has a hard enough time making it back in 12 hours with all of the work they have. Perhaps they didn't have enough time to pick up said bad order. Maybe said bad order was a hot car and needed to move on the next train available. If Q326 had enough time, why not have them stop and pick it up?

These are both instances where the PSR solution actually makes sense and saves money, crew starts and equipment.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
TSS
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 151
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:58 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, MI

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by TSS »

SD80MAC wrote: These are both instances where the PSR solution actually makes sense and saves money, crew starts and equipment.
Agreed. I’m not disputing that operationally, both of those moves make sense. I’m just being a little sarcastic because I find it a sad to see our local railroad with so few trains and so little traffic that such moves make sense.

Last summer, I paid a visit to my original home town of Moorhead, MN, and watching the endless parade of BNSF trains made it painfully obvious how slow things are in West Michigan.

kd_1014
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 4:29 pm
Location: Creston, Grand Rapids

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by kd_1014 »

SD80MAC wrote:
TSS wrote:
Tom49801 wrote: ​E800-23 at Bangor mp CG60.7 @ 15:07:15 with BNSF engines #8400 + #8479, 43 Inter-modal empties, followed by 131 empty coal cars.
Just saw it go past Glenlord.

I love how CSX has quit pretending this is anything other than a backwater operation. Got some TOFC empties that need to go back to the BNSF? Stick ‘em on the front of the coal empties. Why not!

Got a repaired bad order car on a spur with a six axle restriction and D700 has six axle power and only a couple cars? Why, have Q326 stop and use a dozen cars to grab the the car that needs to be picked up. What else would you do with the hottest train on the railroad?!
?????

The coal trains already go right past CSX's 59th St intermodal yard and right to the BNSF. Why burn an extra crew and extra locomotives when you already have a train going there? Sending them via Q327 would take them to Barr yard, which would clog that yard with unnecessary cars and require another crew to bring them to the BNSF.

D700 has a hard enough time making it back in 12 hours with all of the work they have. Perhaps they didn't have enough time to pick up said bad order. Maybe said bad order was a hot car and needed to move on the next train available. If Q326 had enough time, why not have them stop and pick it up?

These are both instances where the PSR solution actually makes sense and saves money, crew starts and equipment.
Very true, but who was the bright one that put the empty well cars in front of the 131 gons?? That just screams derailment at me.
i'm so fresh, they call me fabreeze

Tom49801
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Tom49801 »

Q327 was reported by the DD at mp CG19.1 at approx 18:00 with CSX engines #5477 + #3434 & 114 cars. He's gone into Holland to drop off some cars.
​Q327 has his signal, siding to main, at Holland mp CG25.3 @ 19:09

User avatar
Doktor No
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 5:49 pm

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Doktor No »

And why would that scream derailment? Empty coal gons come in at only 42K or so, what do intermodals come in at? Not a problem...and there are rules and if the consist goes into the computer that runs afoul the computer kicks out ERROR and the consist can't be printed and the train doesn't go. No consist, no train.
Let the big guys worry about the small stuff.
Enjoy Every Sandwich.

Tom49801
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Tom49801 »

Q327 at Bangor mp CG60.7 @ 20:13:13 with CSX engines #5477 + #3434 & 97 cars.

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 8406
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Everyone seems to think empty coal trains weigh a ton. An empty 130 car coal train weighs about 2800 tons, if that.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
Jochs
Iron Horse Whisperer
Posts: 6872
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:52 pm
Location: On my laptop!

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Jochs »

N800 is currently going through Riverside.
Jeff O.
Celebrating 7 and a half years dial-up free!

(18:36:45) MagnumForce: Railfanning is way more fun when you stop caring about locomotives and signals
(19:11:29) cbehr91: I can't believe I'm +1ing Brent but +1

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13902
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan's Copper Country
Contact:

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Saturnalia »

SD80MAC wrote:Everyone seems to think empty coal trains weigh a ton. An empty 130 car coal train weighs about 2800 tons, if that.
Aluminum cars. Lower light weight means more coal can be carried and still fit the 286,000 lb gross rail weight. Besides they usually move in units where tailing tonnage isn't an issue.

It does make for metal spaghetti in derailments though. They get nicely shredded :shock:

georgehmanning
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2018 8:33 pm
Location: Galveston, TX

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by georgehmanning »

​@07:38:47am ET AMTK 371 SC44 #4602 arriving Bangor Michigan with 4 super liner passenger cars

User avatar
CantBeShook.WeHot
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 717
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 8:31 am

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by CantBeShook.WeHot »

q32627 new buffalo MI. q32726 arrived chicago 2:30am. q32827 p company detroit. q32927 trowbridge lansing
d70026 on duty grand rapids. d70726 arrived lansing 6am. d70827 set for 2pm lansing.
n80026 arrived west olive 4:30am. n80027, n80028, n80126, e80027 in system. e80025 set to leave west olive noon.
q15027 set for noon north baltimore. q15127 set for 10:30am detroit. q13126 pendleton IN. q13226 QI 219 IN. q50827 overpeck junction OH. q50927 gtw crossing toledo.

User avatar
BL2-1843
Howell Yardmaster
Posts: 3898
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:50 pm

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by BL2-1843 »

Q32927 by Howell at 08:05 with CSX 5303+4061 and 56 cars. Q32827 went east at 07:00 with CSX 339 leading & 94 cars. Today is my bride and I's 55th Wedding Anniversary. Not this year, but 55 years ago tonight we took a short weekend honeymoon trip to Walbridge Ohio. And, yes the marriage has lasted and she still puts up with me.

donnieland
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1930
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: lyn dore meadows condo's

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by donnieland »

700 os 112th at 957a - 1 motor and 17 cars going long with 3 coils and I rubber and approx. 13 cement picked up
don baxter

User avatar
TSS
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 151
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:58 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, MI

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by TSS »

Decent sized Q326 East at Glenlord Rd/Stevensville right now.

2 locomotives and some interesting loads of tarped scrap (?) in gondolas at the head end.

Tom49801
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2377
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:17 am
Location: Prince Frederick, Maryland

Re: CSX Train Location Updates November 2019

Unread post by Tom49801 »

Q326 was seen at mp CG95 @ 10:02am & reported by the DD at mp CG91.9 with CSX engines #5409 + #701 & 128 cars. Cams are down & will listen to radio.

Locked