GLC Updates April 2018

Daily whereabouts of train locations along with sightings for heads ups to other railfans.
AANscaleRunner
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2226
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:06 pm
Location: Cadillac Michigan

GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by AANscaleRunner »

Saw that 398 is spotted outside the engine house this evening. Assuming a Saturday run into Cadillac yesterday and guessing 3 locomotives since 398 is outside. A long string of sand hoppers was brought in.

AANscaleRunner
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2226
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:06 pm
Location: Cadillac Michigan

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by AANscaleRunner »

398, 396 and 392 left Cadillac for Clare at 1205 with 9 tie loads, 1 covered hopper, 4 pulp wood loads, 2 covered hoppers and 34 sand.

csx801
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by csx801 »

Great Lakes Central south through Mount Pleasant at 16:50

GLC 398 leading
GLC 397
GLC 395
GLC 399

5 plastics hoppers
1 empty centerbeam
3 empty pole flats
1 loaded centerbeam
6 empty tie gondolas
1 hopper
4 loaded pulpwood flatcars
2 feed hoppers
34 sand hoppers

57 total

Todd_F
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:10 am

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by Todd_F »

AANscaleRunner wrote:398, 396 and 392 left Cadillac for Clare at 1205 with 9 tie loads, 1 covered hopper, 4 pulp wood loads, 2 covered hoppers and 34 sand.
They ran about 35 hoppers out to Wexford about 9ish and got back to Selma with 34 about 11:15. I got lucky with this trip!
You know that little voice in your head? My wife says I lack that.

AANscaleRunner
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2226
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:06 pm
Location: Cadillac Michigan

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by AANscaleRunner »

Returned to Cadillac at 1820.


penn central
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by penn central »

Wow 8 loads of coke. Nice and those look like cement loads near the back of the train springs look compressed nice diversification. And sand out of Yuma is steady. Good times for sure.

Todd_F
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:10 am

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by Todd_F »

I'm throwing together a short video and was wondering if some of the more knowledgeable contributors here could give me some info about the line west of Cadillac?
Does the line have a name (old and/or new)?
How far did the line originally go?
When did they abandon the line beyond Yuma?
Has the line been stagnant since 2016?
Was 2016 when they last shipped sand, and was the old sand company Wexford?

Thank you!
You know that little voice in your head? My wife says I lack that.

AANscaleRunner
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2226
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:06 pm
Location: Cadillac Michigan

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by AANscaleRunner »

396 and 392 leaving Cadillac for Clare at 1140 with 1 covered hopper, 3 tie loads, 6 covered hoppers, 9 tanks, 13 cement empties, 1 box and 13 tanks.

User avatar
Pixl
Grand Traverse Dinner Train 1996
Posts: 1649
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:56 pm
Location: Traverse City, Michigan

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by Pixl »

Todd_F wrote:I'm throwing together a short video and was wondering if some of the more knowledgeable contributors here could give me some info about the line west of Cadillac?
Does the line have a name (old and/or new)?
How far did the line originally go?
When did they abandon the line beyond Yuma?
Has the line been stagnant since 2016?
Was 2016 when they last shipped sand, and was the old sand company Wexford?

Thank you!
The line was mostly built by the Ann Arbor RR. NW out of Cadillac passing thru Yuma, Thompsonville, Benzonia, and on toward Frankfort. A small unfinished line, The Frankfort & South Eastern, was acquired by the AA getting the line into Elberta where the ferry docks were built for the cross Lake Michigan service would be.
10-BenzieCoMap.GIF
This was used as a shortcut avoiding the rail traffic congestion of Chicago for freight headed out west. Chicago traffic eased up over the years and the found more efficient ways to move the trains thru there reducing the need for the cross lake operation. I think it ended in the mid 1980's but I don't have the facts to back that up. (someone else maybe). The last train about that time went up to Elberta to rescue a string of hoppers stranded there on the ferry yard. They had mud squirting out from under the ties at some places and even had to cross a paved over parking lot. I have a video of this trip around the house I'll have to try and locate and put it up for others to see.
The sand co. at yuma has recently re-started operations and the tracks are back in use.

Steve B
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:03 pm
Location: East Lansing

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by Steve B »

Todd_F, Google "Ann Arbor Railroad" and you'll find a lot more info. The carferries stopped running on 4/26/82. There remained one or two small freight customers in Frankfort for several more years. In fall 1985 Bluewater Michigan Chapter, NRHS, ran an excursion train to Frankfort. The cleanup train, retrieving the cars Pixl mentioned, ran in 1988. The track was removed from Thompsonville to Frankfort/Elberta around 1994, and Yuma to Thompsonville some years after that.

Pixl, it would be most appreciated by many people if you upload that clean-up run video to YouTube!

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 32160
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by AARR »

Fairmount Minerals operated the sand plant in Yuma and I believe still does
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

Todd_F
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:10 am

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by Todd_F »

Thanks guys, I appreciate the insight! I'll google for more. I'd love to see that video too Pixl!
You know that little voice in your head? My wife says I lack that.

AANscaleRunner
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 2226
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 7:06 pm
Location: Cadillac Michigan

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by AANscaleRunner »

Returned to Cadillac at 1715.

Last edited by AANscaleRunner on Tue Apr 03, 2018 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Raildudes dad
Roadmaster
Posts: 4624
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:12 am
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by Raildudes dad »

AARR wrote:Fairmount Minerals operated the sand plant in Yuma and I believe still does
My good friend google says Sargent Sand now owns the Yuma pit. (I thought it was sold)

User avatar
KC
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:22 pm
Location: Northern Lower Michigan

Fairmount-Santrol?

Unread post by KC »

Here's the people doing the hiring,
maybe they own it :?


https://www.glassdoor.com/Jobs/Fairmoun ... 134603.htm
Last edited by KC on Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I feel like an old railroad man
...and I know I can walk along the tracks,
It may take a little longer but I'll know
how to find my way back"

Image

TC Man
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 818
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 12:25 pm

Re: Fairmount-Santrol?

Unread post by TC Man »

KC wrote:Here's the people doing the hiring,
maybe they own it :?


https://www.glassdoor.com/Jobs/Fairmoun ... 134603.htm

Fairmount still owns it. They bought it from Wexford Sand many years ago. Fairmount sign is back up since they reopened when I drove over there last week.

Raildudes dad
Roadmaster
Posts: 4624
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:12 am
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by Raildudes dad »

Fairmont Santrol may very well own it but don't claim it on their website. Digging around a bit, it appears Sargent owned an adjacent pit but the county records show all the land in and around the pit area is owned by Wexford Sand. So Fairmont it is :)

TC Man
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 818
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 12:25 pm

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by TC Man »

Raildudes dad wrote:Fairmont Santrol may very well own it but don't claim it on their website. Digging around a bit, it appears Sargent owned an adjacent pit but the county records show all the land in and around the pit area is owned by Wexford Sand. So Fairmont it is :)

Train into Cadillac today was 67 cars!

RDD- Sargent had a pit just beyond Yuma on the other side of Mesick. They may still own the property, as some equipment is still there.

Fairmount removed the Yuma site (actually technically Harrieta) when they closed it and just have not yet updated the website to say it's reopened.

User avatar
AARR
Ann Arbor RR Nerd
Posts: 32160
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: Washington, MI

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by AARR »

Sargent opened a pit/plant a little east of Harlan around 1980 and operated it until about 1984-85. At its peak it shipped around 30-40 cars a week, about half of what Yuma was shipping. Although it hasn't been operated in 30+ years some of the equipment remains on the property. There's a thread on the board about Sargent's Harlan sand plant.
Raildudes dad wrote:it appears Sargent owned an adjacent pit
PatC created a monster, 'cause nobody wants to see Don Simon no more they want AARR I'm chopped liver, well if you want AARR this is what I'll give ya, bad humor mixed with irrelevant info that'll make you roll your eyes quicker than a ~Z~ banhammer...

User avatar
Pixl
Grand Traverse Dinner Train 1996
Posts: 1649
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:56 pm
Location: Traverse City, Michigan

Re: GLC Updates April 2018

Unread post by Pixl »

AARR wrote: There's a thread on the board about Sargent's Harlan sand plant.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=35638&p=392449&hili ... nt#p392375

Post Reply