Congress corralling rail monopoly power

News or chat about railroad info that pertains to the entire United States, another state, or country.
BNSF 1088
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 132
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:05 am
Location: Lafayette LA
Contact:

Congress corralling rail monopoly power

Unread post by BNSF 1088 »

Congress corralling rail monopoly power

WASHINGTON – The railroads' arrogance toward employees and captive shippers is starting to meet resistance in Congress. The UTU PAC is playing an important role.



As reported elsewhere, the UTU PAC-- which gives the UTU significant influence in Congress and state legislatures by helping to elect labor-friendly lawmakers -- was used to bring CSX to the bargaining table and end its practice of subjecting Amtrak and commuter rail employees to double jeopardy, which caused many to be fired from their Amtrak and commuter rail jobs.



Also, legislation is being readied in Congress requiring the Surface Transportation Board (STB) to cease operating as a wholly owned subsidiary of the railroad industry.



By requiring the STB to do as the Interstate Commerce Act instructs, rather than as the railroads wish, the legislation could eventually reverse regulatory decisions that have gutted labor protection where short lines are created – often for the sole purpose of forcing down wages and eliminating employee benefits.



Meanwhile, on March 5, the Senate Judiciary Committee favorably reported, by a 14-0 vote, a bill subjecting railroads to the same antitrust laws as other American industry.



The Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009, authored by Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wisc.) would repeal the railroads' partial exemption from the antitrust laws and allow state attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission to review mergers under the antitrust laws.



Also, it would allow private parties to sue for three-fold damages and pursue court orders to halt anticompetitive conduct by railroads.



The railroads were so busy trying unsuccessfully to stop that vote by the Senate Judiciary Committee that they did not have time to respond to a Bloomberg News request for comment on a National Transportation Safety Board hearing March 4 that affected their member carriers.



Yes, the railroads are on the defensive, big time, as labor friendly lawmakers and a labor-friendly Obama administration look closely at the carriers' past and present conduct toward captive shippers and rail labor.



The Antitrust Enforcement Act, as favorably voted out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is expected to reach the Senate floor for a vote by Memorial Day.



A similar antitrust bill in the House, sponsored by Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) is expected to be reported to the House floor for a vote by May.



Railroad monopoly power has "been a major problem for part of a sector of our economy, rural businesses, where we’re trying to promote more competition," said Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who co-sponsored the antitrust bill.



Rail captive shippers say that in spite of the economic recession, railroad monopolies are allowing railroads extensive pricing power, as evidenced by significant jumps in profits during 2008. Union Pacific, for example, reported an almost 40 percent jump in profits during the 4Q 2008, while virtually all other sectors of the economy were sliding into recession.



Robert Szabo, executive director of a rail captive shipper group, Consumers United for Rail Equity, said that the Senate Judiciary Committee's unanimous vote in favor of the antitrust bill "shows the growing support for the antitrust legislation and the increasing awareness in Congress of rail customer problems."



UTU International President Mike Futhey, and UTU National Legislative Director James Stem, have been meeting lately with Szabo and other captive shipper representatives to discuss matters of mutual concern.



Former congressman Glenn English, now CEO of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, said, with regard to the antitrust bill, "The chairmen of the committees of jurisdiction are supporting the legislation, and these congressional leaders, as well as more and more members of Congress, are hearing about rail problems from consumers, manufacturers, farmers and regulators back home."



Corralling the STB



Separately, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), who is chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, and Rep. Jim Oberstar (D-Minn.), who is chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, are readying legislation to level the rail regulatory playing field.



Rockefeller and Oberstar are preparing legislation that will reform the rate challenge process of the Surface Transportation Board – essentially requiring that the STB follow the Interstate Commerce Act rather than act as a wholly owned subsidiary of the railroad industry.



The STB and its predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission, have rubber-stamped railroad merger after railroad merger that adversely affected rail employees as well as captive shippers.



The STB also took it upon itself, during the early 1980s, to trample on the Interstate Commerce Act's promise of labor protection in line sales and leases. It is a problem that persists today.



Congress is beginning to take note that, all too frequently, railroads hire, to lucrative positions, rail regulators who have cast votes favoring railroads – votes that adversely affect employees and captive shippers.



This, according to critics of the agency, sends a veiled signal to STB senior staff and regulators that, if they vote with the railroads, there will be lucrative railroad employment awaiting them at a later date.



This problem, which continues today, was first identified by consumer advocate Ralph Nader more than three decades ago.
March 6, 2009
Director of Save Our Trains Michigan

BNSF Conductor Lafayette LA

User avatar
TSB
peon
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Congress corralling rail monopoly power

Unread post by TSB »

Could you get your union bosses to call for a strike on the recession?
That will solve our problems.
Maybe they should lobby for a law that requires RRs to retain all hourly employees forever.
With total control in D.C. they may want to require that 60% of all RR Boards of Directors
be union members.
Much progress can be made.
5 years on college faculties
34 years working on railroads

RR is more fun

Typhoon
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 1186
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:16 pm
Location: Under a palm tree

Re: Congress corralling rail monopoly power

Unread post by Typhoon »

When
Last edited by Typhoon on Fri May 08, 2009 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

CSX_CO
Over and Out
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Congress corralling rail monopoly power

Unread post by CSX_CO »

I think its funny that the UTU takes exception to STB and Government Officals getting 'high ranking' positions within the railroads after their tenure serving the 'people'. Most of the former UTU leadership ends up in jail for fraud, racketeering, embezzlement, etc. Boyd sent to jail, Paul Thompson going to jail, etc.

The Utilities are crying the biggest 'foul' and they are the definition of Monopoly! I go to my electric provider and ask for alternatives to their service, and they'd laugh at me.

Even more proof positive I'm glad I'm not in the UTU. Going to be a lot of UTU members on the streets if the railroads get re-regulated. They think they've made deep cuts now, just wait until then.

Practice Safe CSX

User avatar
TSB
peon
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Florida

Antitrust bill "teriffic" says Obama nominee

Unread post by TSB »

As reported in a 'breaking news " article by Railway Age.

Chirstene Barney, made that statement to Sen. Kohl (D-Wis.) [cosponsor
of the bill with Sen. Feingold (D-Wis.)] at her confirmation hearing. Their
discussions continued to lament the weakness of Dept. of Justice for not
fighting-off mergers between U.S. Class Is during the Bush administration.

Railway Age pointed-out that the last merger between two US Class is was in
1997 during the Clinton admin. The other two during Clinton's years were
quashed by the STB without DOJ help. In fact, DOJ had approved one.

My guess is; the RRs are about to get hammered.
5 years on college faculties
34 years working on railroads

RR is more fun

JDavis21835
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:27 pm

Re: Antitrust bill "teriffic" says Obama nominee

Unread post by JDavis21835 »

TSB wrote:As reported in a 'breaking news " article by Railway Age.

Chirstene Barney, made that statement to Sen. Kohl (D-Wis.) [cosponsor
of the bill with Sen. Feingold (D-Wis.)] at her confirmation hearing. Their
discussions continued to lament the weakness of Dept. of Justice for not
fighting-off mergers between U.S. Class Is during the Bush administration.

Railway Age pointed-out that the last merger between two US Class is was in
1997 during the Clinton admin. The other two during Clinton's years were
quashed by the STB without DOJ help. In fact, DOJ had approved one.

My guess is; the RRs are about to get hammered.
I think a lot of business is about to get hammered. I think banks are number one on their list though.

User avatar
TSB
peon
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Florida

Banks

Unread post by TSB »

Check this out.

http://www.news-press.net/AP/bailouttracker.html

click anywhere on the page and view every bank on the sliding scale on the left.
5 years on college faculties
34 years working on railroads

RR is more fun

Post Reply