Okay I tried to do this the best I could they are only off size wise by about 20-30 pixels.
Which one looks the best, I accidently clicked save instead of Save As so I lost the one straight off the camera.
Its Q335-17 on 9-17-2006 at the W.E. S. Lyon for those wondering.
Verson 1, the Current Method
Verson 2 the new method
Trying new ways to edit my photos
- ~Z~
- Sofa King Admin
- Posts: 12943
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Grand Rapids, MI
- Contact:
I like #1 more just because the sky isn't as blown out.
Webmaster
Railroad photos on Railroadfan.com
Railroad photos on Railroadfan.com
- ~Z~
- Sofa King Admin
- Posts: 12943
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Grand Rapids, MI
- Contact:
Do you have any tool on your editting program like photoshop's "shadow/highlight" tool? It darkens the bright areas, or vice versa.Mike Tabone wrote:Hmm, I thought # 2 looked better, I'm gonna try to select just the sky and try to make it look more like #1. I'll be glad when I get that Nikon D50 I've been eying, I'll have less editing to do.
I certainly hope your D50 will have less editing..but I doubt it. I know I do more editting now with my 30D than I did with my point and shoot...My old Canon A40 did more in camera processing so I didn't have to edit much... new camera, almost everything is processed on the computer.
Webmaster
Railroad photos on Railroadfan.com
Railroad photos on Railroadfan.com
Well, regardless of your camera, in Photoshop, you can do all the editing you want.Mike Tabone wrote:Yeah, but with a newer better camera, I will have less editing to do, right now all I can do in the modes is add a grid line, and adjust the brightness of the image.
Also, a better camera doesn't mean less editing. You've still got to know how to use the correct settings to expose a picture properly.