Kodak Z700 Vs Nikon 4600

Questions on editing, camera settings, equipment, critiques, how to upload photos, etc....
CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Kodak Z700 Vs Nikon 4600

Unread post by CAT345C »

Okay, been using my folks Kodak Z700 this weekend:
I'm kinda disapointed with it, although it does have manual control settings, I have not touched them yet.
Heres one from the Kodak today E945-"Christmas Eve" at Mill St in South Lyon
Promblem:
1. Clouds look bad
2. time delay with the screen, and eye viewer is to small
3. flash turns on everytime you turn it on
Image

Then heres one with my Nikon:
Image

Which do you think looks better? Both Were taken at roughly the same time.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10460
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Unread post by SD80MAC »

I have a Z700 and while it's not best on overcast days, the manual settings do come in handy. Night shots come out very nice with 8" exposures, too. Yeah, the flash turning on everytime drives me crazy. :)

On sunny days it can be quite rewarding though.

Image
Image
Image
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
Railzfan
SpecialDuty
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 12:35 am
Location: Rockford, MI.
Contact:

Unread post by Railzfan »

This has nothing to do with the camera, but Mike, what was the number on that nice looking BNSF SD70ACe?

And John, when did you take that pic of 9026? I have not seen one of the old MPI units for a long time, I know some where former SP, SSW and UP, 19 SD45's and 1 SD39. Numbered 9000-9020. Do you have a side pic?

Thanks, and great pix's! :)
~Andrew Kersting

Website - Rocky Mountain Custom Models

Long Live the Denver & Rio Grande Western!

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10460
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Sure do, Railzfan. Believe it or not, I've been seeing these HLCX ex-MPI rebuilt SD45s around here fairly often the last few months. The picture was taken the week of Thanksgiving. That day the 9026 was lashed up with another matching ex-MPI unit. Made for a cool consist!

At Buchanann St.
Image

The trailing 9018
Image

Both across the Thornapple River bridge.
Image

Here's a link to the rest of these classy units that I've seen. http://conrail-jon.rrpicturearchives.ne ... spx?mid=29
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

sd70accsxt700
Sofa King follower
Posts: 6159
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Toledo, OH.

Unread post by sd70accsxt700 »

Actually ex-MPI go all the way up to 9047, ex-SD40's & SD45's
https://flic.kr/ps/jSuAb My Flickr photos!

User avatar
Railzfan
SpecialDuty
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 12:35 am
Location: Rockford, MI.
Contact:

Unread post by Railzfan »

Thanks John, I will have to keep an eye out for them. 9018 was a former Southern Pacific unit, I will post the details about her later tonight.

Thanks again for the great pix! :)
~Andrew Kersting

Website - Rocky Mountain Custom Models

Long Live the Denver & Rio Grande Western!

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Unread post by CAT345C »

RailFanz that would be BNSF 9334 for some reason the away shot with the # board will not let me upload it.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
Railzfan
SpecialDuty
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 12:35 am
Location: Rockford, MI.
Contact:

Unread post by Railzfan »

Thanks Mike, and that's strange why you could not upload the pic?!?!? Try resizing it and saving it with a different name...that may help. :)
~Andrew Kersting

Website - Rocky Mountain Custom Models

Long Live the Denver & Rio Grande Western!

User avatar
Railzfan
SpecialDuty
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 12:35 am
Location: Rockford, MI.
Contact:

Unread post by Railzfan »

One other note: MPI 9018 was former Southern Pacific SD45 8935.

And thanks Matt for the info...I know they go all the way up to 9047...but I was stating that the #'s 9001-9020 where former SP, SSW and UP units. They where mostly SD40's and SD45's with the exception of MPI 9001 (ex-IT 2305/N&W 2965) which was a SD39.
~Andrew Kersting

Website - Rocky Mountain Custom Models

Long Live the Denver & Rio Grande Western!

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Unread post by CAT345C »

For some reason I cannot edit it and save it, and if I cannot resize it, it will be way to big to look any bit decent, and since they were moving at track speed, I have a nice shot of a 6 bethgons, stupid camera delay, or it was because the horn was really loud, and my left hear was hurting really bad after it hit the crossing.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

User avatar
SD80MAC
Ingersoll's Mr. Michigan
Posts: 10460
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:59 pm
Location: Grand Rapids

Unread post by SD80MAC »

Railzfan wrote:One other note: MPI 9018 was former Southern Pacific SD45 8935.

And thanks Matt for the info...I know they go all the way up to 9047...but I was stating that the #'s 9001-9020 where former SP, SSW and UP units. They where mostly SD40's and SD45's with the exception of MPI 9001 (ex-IT 2305/N&W 2965) which was a SD39.
There's a few ex CB&Q's and PRR's too.
"Remember, 4 mph is a couple, 5's a collision!"
http://flickriver.com/photos/conrail680 ... teresting/
Image

User avatar
Railzfan
SpecialDuty
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 12:35 am
Location: Rockford, MI.
Contact:

Unread post by Railzfan »

Mike is sounds like the photo file is corrupted, I had that happen to me once too! I’m not really sure if there is anything you can do about it except re-download the photo’s from your camera if they are still on it. And it’s too bad that your camera has a delay, I remember my old cam did too and I was always missing the good stuff. :(

And thanks for the update about MPI 9021-9047, I didn’t know some of them where former PRR and CB&Q. Thanks for the info.
~Andrew Kersting

Website - Rocky Mountain Custom Models

Long Live the Denver & Rio Grande Western!

User avatar
~Z~
Sofa King Admin
Posts: 12933
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Contact:

Unread post by ~Z~ »

Mike, between the Kodak and the Nikon photos, main difference is that the Kodak is backlit, looking somewhat towards the sun, while the Nikon photo has the sun at your back, where it should be. It's hard to compare the two due to this.

Flash turning on on every shot, with no option to turn it off, sounds odd..but if it's true, i'd stick with the nikon.

I'd highly suggest using manual modes as often as you can when you have a minute or two to set up for the shot.
Webmaster
Railroad photos on Railroadfan.com

CAT345C
RedNeck Train Chaser
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: Buffalo Location
Contact:

Unread post by CAT345C »

I agree Zack, but both of those shots had me running, in steel toes, for about 400 yards, because I missed judge the timing since some crews call the signal after they pass it, and some call it when they see it. If I wasn't a Cross Country Runner, I wouldn't have made it for any of the shots.
Making the railroad all Catywompus since 2008

https://www.flickr.com/gp/66353741@N07/02EZ1e

Post Reply