Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Questions on editing, camera settings, equipment, critiques, how to upload photos, etc....
legostudios34
The Lego Railfan
Posts: 709
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:55 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by legostudios34 »

I played around in Photoshop last night and turned a fairly boring broadside shot into a something that looks like a pan shot.

Image

What do you guys think?
Baxter Barnes. 21. Alabama.
Meow. Now you know how to speak cat. -Flickr
Image

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13935
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan's Copper Country
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by Saturnalia »

Not quite a traditional pan, but I like it! :D

I wish that the road was fully visible at the crossing, with the signs, however.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

GreatLakesRailfan
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 4727
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:28 am
Location: Marysville, Michigan

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by GreatLakesRailfan »

I like it.

legostudios34
The Lego Railfan
Posts: 709
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:55 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by legostudios34 »

Thanks guys.

MQT, there are no signs at that crossing.
Baxter Barnes. 21. Alabama.
Meow. Now you know how to speak cat. -Flickr
Image

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13935
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan's Copper Country
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by Saturnalia »

legostudios34 wrote: MQT, there are no signs at that crossing.
None at all?

Either way, I still would have enjoyed it more with the full crossing visible. It is a great shot, but it could be better next time, IMO. :wink:
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

legostudios34
The Lego Railfan
Posts: 709
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:55 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by legostudios34 »

No signs at all. Its a driveway for a farm I thinkm
Baxter Barnes. 21. Alabama.
Meow. Now you know how to speak cat. -Flickr
Image

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13935
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan's Copper Country
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by Saturnalia »

legostudios34 wrote:No signs at all. Its a driveway for a farm I thinkm
Even farm crossings usually have signs...at least around here...
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

CSX_CO
Over and Out
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by CSX_CO »

MQT3001 wrote:
legostudios34 wrote:No signs at all. Its a driveway for a farm I thinkm
Even farm crossings usually have signs...at least around here...
Different states, different laws. Most farmers crossings don't require any kind of signs, and the horn isn't usually blown for them either. Its not a 'public crossing at grade' its a private one.

Plus, with signs on the crossing, doing a 'pan' they'd be blurry and distracting anyway.

Practice Safe CSX

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13935
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan's Copper Country
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by Saturnalia »

CSX_CO wrote: Plus, with signs on the crossing, doing a 'pan' they'd be blurry and distracting anyway.
Didn't think about that.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by J T »

MQT3001 wrote:Not quite a traditional pan, but I like it! :D
As a non-photographer, what would you define as being a traditional pan?

If Baxter had shown me that picture and said it was a pan shot, I would have been able to identify how it's a fake because of one particular aspect of a pan shot. Can you?

legostudios34
The Lego Railfan
Posts: 709
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:55 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by legostudios34 »

On Sunday afternoon I practiced shooting real pan shots of cars. I probably shot 100 pictures but only 10 or so came out decent. I was about to try it on the DPU of a coal train yesterday when the camera battery died... So no real pan shots of trains for now.
Baxter Barnes. 21. Alabama.
Meow. Now you know how to speak cat. -Flickr
Image

User avatar
Saturnalia
Authority on Cat
Posts: 13935
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan's Copper Country
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by Saturnalia »

J T wrote:
MQT3001 wrote:Not quite a traditional pan, but I like it! :D
As a non-photographer, what would you define as being a traditional pan?

If Baxter had shown me that picture and said it was a pan shot, I would have been able to identify how it's a fake because of one particular aspect of a pan shot. Can you?
The scenery is fuzz, not elongated like a normal pan.
Thornapple River Rail Series - YouTube
Safety today is your investment for tomorrow

CSX_CO
Over and Out
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by CSX_CO »

J T wrote: If Baxter had shown me that picture and said it was a pan shot, I would have been able to identify how it's a fake because of one particular aspect of a pan shot. Can you?
Just a guess: In a pan, isn't it usually the 'center of focus' that stays 'stationary' while the edges would be a bit blurry?

Practice Safe CSX

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by J T »

MQT3001 wrote: The scenery is fuzz, not elongated like a normal pan.
Well that would all depend on the shutter speed and how fast the pan movement is. Pans don't always look elongated.

User avatar
J T
Hates Supper
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Grand Rapids
Contact:

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by J T »

CSX_CO wrote:
J T wrote: If Baxter had shown me that picture and said it was a pan shot, I would have been able to identify how it's a fake because of one particular aspect of a pan shot. Can you?
Just a guess: In a pan, isn't it usually the 'center of focus' that stays 'stationary' while the edges would be a bit blurry?

Practice Safe CSX
And a correct guess at that. The sharpest part of a pan should be directly in front of you (in the case of a train, perpendicular to the subject). As the lens captures the subject beyond the 90 degree angle to the left and right, the movement between the subject and the lens is at a different speed, hence it will show the effect of motion blur.

User avatar
MDH
rp.net addict
Posts: 2687
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:30 pm
Location: Toledo, OH

Re: Played Around in Photoshop for a while

Unread post by MDH »

Plus that tree casting the shadow on the autorack must be moving along with the train... ;)
Michael Harding
P&WV fan in HO

Post Reply