Blurry? Perhaps you just need the next Photoshop...

[MDH]

http://www.geek.com/articles/geek-pick/ ... -20111011/

(still a proponent of "do it right in the first place" but none the less, wow...)

[J T]

http://www.geek.com/articles/geek-pick/ ... -20111011/

(still a proponent of "do it right in the first place" but none the less, wow...)

No matter how diligent you are about doing it "right in the first place," sometimes the camera just doesn't want to.

I watched that video and read the updated page about what it couldn't do, and it seems very limited. It's actually more directed toward camera shake and not actual OOF, blurry shots.

[B-Town]

This would be very handy when shooting trains with my flashes where the triggers' sync speed is only 1/200 second.

[railohio]

Not so fast...

Adobe admits using 'synthetic blur' image in deblur demo

[J T]

Not so fast...

Adobe admits using 'synthetic blur' image in deblur demo

Kind of what I eluded to earlier. The synthetic blur they applied was more like camera shake where the edges in the image are doubled up. That, I believe, is where this new feature will work the best. Their actual blurry photo example didn't fare too well.