http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject. ... 9818&key=0
The screener either doesn't like trains, or loves men.
PEQ - Wow
Re: PEQ - Wow
The screener for that picture was probably some 55 year-old woman who is somewhat heavyset and has legs that look like they were published by Rand McNally.
Jeff O.
Celebrating 11 years dial-up free!
(18:36:45) MagnumForce: Railfanning is way more fun when you stop caring about locomotives and signals
(19:11:29) cbehr91: I can't believe I'm +1ing Brent but +1
Celebrating 11 years dial-up free!
(18:36:45) MagnumForce: Railfanning is way more fun when you stop caring about locomotives and signals
(19:11:29) cbehr91: I can't believe I'm +1ing Brent but +1
-
sd70accsxt700
- Sofa King follower
- Posts: 6159
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:59 pm
- Location: Toledo, OH.
Re: PEQ - Wow
Yea but there is a lot of other stuff wrong with that photo. Loco is out of focus and it looks overexposed.
https://flic.kr/ps/jSuAb My Flickr photos!
Re: PEQ - Wow
The engine is out of focus slightly, but it's not overexposed. It was rejected once for being underexposed and soft, then rejected for the PEQ.
Bottom text.
-
sd70accsxt700
- Sofa King follower
- Posts: 6159
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:59 pm
- Location: Toledo, OH.
Re: PEQ - Wow
Well then its the saturation. Either way its flat, very flat.
https://flic.kr/ps/jSuAb My Flickr photos!
Re: PEQ - Wow
Loco out of focus? didnt even see the loco, the focus is on the caboose 
Re: PEQ - Wow
Matt likes boys. He had hard nipples and I touched them.Scooterb wrote:Loco out of focus? didnt even see the loco, the focus is on the caboose
Bottom text.
-
StupidFleet
- Chinese Foooood
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 4:38 pm
- Location: Deshler
- Contact:
Re: PEQ - Wow
Scooterb wrote:Loco out of focus? didnt even see the loco, the focus is on the caboose
Ok.....
-
railohio
- Photographer of Wires in America by Rail of Ohio & Wisconsin
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:44 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
Re: PEQ - Wow
You didn't see the front side!sd70accsxt700 wrote:Well then its the saturation. Either way its flat, very flat.
"I shot the freight train / But I did not shoot the fantrip"
Re: PEQ - Wow
Heh. I got PEQ'd on a piece of tail in front of a train tonight also...
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject. ... =354534809
But seriously Y@ - aside from the girl, that shot sucks. Composition isn't good, color/contrast or something looks a bit off, the train is awkwardly cut off and there's a bunch of "dead space" on a good part of the left that's just ugly gravel. Really pretty far from being one of your better efforts. To make it on as a "pretty girl" shot it still has to be a good shot and not just a cute chick's butt somewhere in the picture.
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject. ... =354534809
But seriously Y@ - aside from the girl, that shot sucks. Composition isn't good, color/contrast or something looks a bit off, the train is awkwardly cut off and there's a bunch of "dead space" on a good part of the left that's just ugly gravel. Really pretty far from being one of your better efforts. To make it on as a "pretty girl" shot it still has to be a good shot and not just a cute chick's butt somewhere in the picture.
Michael Harding
P&WV fan in HO
P&WV fan in HO
Re: PEQ - Wow
FOAM 
-
MP73point4
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:24 pm
- Location: Billtown, MI
Re: PEQ - Wow
Maybe if you cropped out the distracting train at the top and the gravel on the left........ It would certainly improve the esthetic qualities of the photo!
RR Pass Collector
-
midland sub
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:10 pm
Re: PEQ - Wow
Y@ you ignored the #1 rule of RP.net, it's got to be a 3/4 wedgie. I've studied the pic for a couple of minutes. Don't see a wedgie..... 
-
MagnumForce
- Angry Man
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:48 pm
- Location: Tri State Area
Re: PEQ - Wow
Poor Greg...
-
StupidFleet
- Chinese Foooood
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 4:38 pm
- Location: Deshler
- Contact:
Re: PEQ - Wow
Good to see everybody's enjoying looking at my sister...MagnumForce wrote:Poor Greg...
-
redside20
- i don't give a fark about your PM
- Posts: 3514
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:44 am
- Location: Columbus Ohio
- Contact:
Re: PEQ - Wow
So this is the person i heard everyone talking about all weekend long..i'm glad i can finally put a "face" with a name.dti407 wrote:Good to see everybody's enjoying looking at my sister...MagnumForce wrote:Poor Greg...
Exit stage left
-
mlmphotography
- Railroadfan...fan
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:45 pm
- Contact:
Re: PEQ - Wow
Good to see the screener found the rejection button for these types of shots.
Y@, you can do so much better than this.
Loyd L.
Y@, you can do so much better than this.
Loyd L.
http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=18157 <-- Photos Here.
Re: PEQ - Wow
For the love of god, putting the shot on in the first place was a joke. Just like any other shot, I won't lose and sleep over this one getting rejected, regardless of how good I can do.mlmphotography wrote:Good to see the screener found the rejection button for these types of shots.
Y@, you can do so much better than this.
Loyd L.
Bottom text.
Re: PEQ - Wow
Y@, didn't you know that the internet is serious business ?Y@ wrote:For the love of god, putting the shot on in the first place was a joke.
Re: PEQ - Wow
Yeah I must have forgot that part.SD40-2 wrote:Y@, didn't you know that the internet is serious business ?Y@ wrote:For the love of god, putting the shot on in the first place was a joke.
Bottom text.