I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Questions on editing, camera settings, equipment, critiques, how to upload photos, etc....
B-Town
Foamer Photographe​r?!?!?!!?
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:23 pm

I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Unread post by B-Town »

Hello everyone!
I thought I'd get on here, so I could complain... :wink:
What are your thought's on the screener's reasoning behind this rejection? It's obviously cloudy, so I don't think I'll try again. After thinking about it for a while, I wondered if they thought the crew was trespassing, but that would mean they didn't read the caption (or do they ever read those? :roll: ).

The link :arrow: http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=927038

Thanks!

TrainWatcher
The Beast
Posts: 5934
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:28 pm

Re: I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Unread post by TrainWatcher »

Yea, I dont see a PEQ unless they thought the crew was railfans. I do like including the crew in the shot.

User avatar
cbehr91
Chairman of the Bored
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 9:29 pm
Location: Stella Ct
Contact:

Re: I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Unread post by cbehr91 »

The water tower above the b-unit, perhaps?

And I was in Bucyrus at the same time by the T&OC depot and it was perfectly sunny, but it doesn't look that way in this photo.

User avatar
railohio
Photographer of Wires in America by Rail of Ohio & Wisconsin
Posts: 1789
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:44 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Re: I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Unread post by railohio »

Why would you upload a photo you expect to get rejected to begin with?
"I shot the freight train / But I did not shoot the fantrip"

mlmphotography
Railroadfan...fan
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:45 pm
Contact:

Re: I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Unread post by mlmphotography »

Nothing says they are NS employees to me. I see two people who appear to be foaming over an epic cloudy day photo they just took.. lol

And I figure that's exactly what the screener thought too.

It would have been nailed for the poor lighting or common / cloudy anyway.

Loyd L.

User avatar
Y@
Ass. Janitor
Posts: 5588
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:37 pm

Re: I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Unread post by Y@ »

railohio wrote:Why would you upload a photo you expect to get rejected to begin with?
It's all part of the fun of submitting! I've had a few "doubtfuls" get on and surprise me.

See the following:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.p ... 764&nseq=8
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.p ... 85&nseq=14
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.p ... 8&nseq=120
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.p ... 3&nseq=232
Bottom text.

User avatar
Mr. Tops
Ferroequinologist
Posts: 2996
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 1:21 pm
Location: P&E Country

Re: I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Unread post by Mr. Tops »

If they are the crew, they better hope a manager doesn't see that picture...no safety vests or any other PPE, standing in the guage and what is he doing? Playing with his phone? Well whatever it is, they are standing in the guage not paying any attention. None of that probably has to do with why the photo was rejected...only one person knows why it was really rejected, the rest of us can just guess.

A No.1
To Portland
Posts: 2686
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:34 pm
Location: Battle Creek

Re: I expected a cloudy rejection, but got...

Unread post by A No.1 »

All of the above. You should have taken a shot without those guys, whoever they are.
Mark it Zero.

Post Reply